Thread: An Idea
View Single Post
Re: An Idea
Old
  (#1015 (permalink))
Fredrick
Master
Fredrick is just really niceFredrick is just really nice
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 660
Thanks Given: 60
Thanked 125x in 100 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: An Idea - 05-02-2008, 06:01 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger View Post
I'm intrigued with the double pyramid as well. I have been looking for a possible link with the second electron shell of the atomic structure using the tangrams. How do you see it?
Hi Felix,

First with Pat's drawing of the 8 cubicles, 8 appears to be much more natural to me than I ever expected before. I remember having the same kind of surprise (of being puzzled) why the second electron shell (and third) has place for up to 8 electrons.

In my theory, a single pyramid already displays all that is needed, and I regard a double pyramid as a curious visualization that may be intriguing, but not telling the story correctly (even kind of blocking a proper view on everything). However, when considering a pyramid as the basis of an abstract delivery of everything, then of course seeing a pyramid shape, albeit a double header, remains an interesting signal about someone's thinking about abstract structures.

What I find interesting is that the first shell to the last shows a jump from:
2 - 8 - 8 - 16 - 16 - 32 - &...
The first shell strongly points to a dual aspect of the principle in our universe (in my theory, duality plays a very important, but not all-exclusive role), and I would see 8 then as 2 to the third power. What is interesting though is that there is not a 'normal' increase, such a 2 to the first, 2 to the second, 2 to the third power, etc. But we see a
2 to the 1st,
2 to the 3rd,
2 to the 3rd,
2 to the 4th,
2 to the 4th
sequence of electrons per shell.
I found something similar (though different) in my mathematical delivery on number zero and the prime numbers.

It is almost as if indicating that the second and third shells (and the fourth and the fifth shells) are paired spatially/structurally, and should possibly be regarded as dual rows, in which one plays the primary role, and the second shell plays the complimentary role (like DNA sequencing?). What are your thoughts, Felix?


The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not.
  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fredrick For This Useful Post:
Felix Schrodinger (05-03-2008)