[Fripro]

Pat. Thank you for your welcome. I am suprised to see that others have thought about the difference in the so called published width of the Universe with respect to it age.

As I am a ardent believer that the Universe always was and always will be, I can only not understand the difference in the width of the universe and its so called big bang age--unless. . . .

One believes that vewing photo graphs in stero, from the Hubble telescope indicates that the Universe is rotating--thus the difference in the width to age measurement.

However if one also says the Universe is eternal, then the big bang is only a local bang, and the cyclic idea of the Universe is due to its rotation --which by the way also give us a complicated formula for gravity "g"

However none of it makes sense unless the Universe has an atmosphere dark matter, and its vortes galaxies its dark energy.