Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo  The circular whirlpool are horizontal. The standing wave are water molecules that are overcoming escape velocity, has upward vertical momentum.
Also, if the whirlpool are driven by a huge clear air vortex, the standing tidal wave driven by vortrex has vortically upward vertical momentum. See a detailed description on vortrex that is driven by a singular vortex.
Thanks. |
NO! Thank you Vincent
I just wanted to hear it from you that it was vertical. say no more.
In my paper on vectoring I am going to be describing three forms of interaction of two (minimum) forms on an event horizon, impact, repel and attraction.
Of these three events all interaction can be perceived by vectoring from any platform of study.
Thus consciousness does hold the key by the way we (can) perceive the vectoring of form after an event horizon.
Some form having the ability to do work is in a confined mater of existence. Some form after interaction with other form has the ability to do work.
E=Mc2 is the best descriptive of the smashing event to confined energy formula but what if one wanted to create anti gravity for the example. Are we going to ride the top of a mushroom?
Two transient particle form coming to an explosion lifts the item … but so does controlled rocketry and what I purport to is something new.
The event that changes the direction of particle form just by interaction without the smashing event is possible to describe for perception by rule one vectoring. I do not like the smashing thingy, to violent, to ... unnatural or maybe better said un needed?
Why one might want to do this vectoring is to create a true anti gravity form of lift motion in a near inexhaustible supply of energy being used and thus that could be used in space, the true near light speed propellant, vectoring what is readily available in the all, transient vectored formed energy in motion.
There is an event horizon predictable when two particle forms interact by attraction and repel laws of opposite polar state. Where they have come from I label as the negative and where they are to be is the positive and this is to a given snapshot slice, “ where one is looking from a platform in advance he will see a positive form coming at him, where one looks from behind he will perceive a negative gone past him form, so on the event horizon or snapshot point of interaction we predict the vector. We further can predict the quantum changes, the adding and subtracting between the forms.
If in the event that two similar particle forms are parallel to each other in different direction they can be perceived as opposites and therefore going to attract toward each other and thus they will change direction, and be perceived as one stream going from the point of interaction in opposite direction to each other in a vertical plane.
Now we can build on this to varied form interaction. Do we want to?
Quark would be the base for this study but varied quantified composition of the meld at any level will do just fine on any platform of study. The Aurora Borealis shows rule one in proton interaction but it will hold true to other particle fluid form ... size momentum ... lots of variables ... to many to list here. It is the All.
ill be in here next week
Peace Graham ~