Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett  In my paper on vectoring I am going to be describing three forms of interaction of two (minimum) forms on an event horizon, impact, repel and attraction.
Of these three events all interaction can be perceived by vectoring from any platform of study.
Thus consciousness does hold the key by the way we (can) perceive the vectoring of form after an event horizon.
Some form having the ability to do work is in a confined mater of existence. Some form after interaction with other form has the ability to do work. |
Based on hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity, the creation of all natural structures and living organisms has a fundamental link to this universal singular vortex mechanism. All steady state forms as physical structures are held stable by self-perpetuating vortical inertial forces, are EMF of different wavelengths. The fundamental building blocks of universe evidently are subatomic singular vortices, as described in
the geometrical structure of an atom. Find a recently added section on fathoming the subatomic particles.
Evidently, the reality we are conceiving can be preceived as a persistence illusion from another perception, all states of matter are merely EMF interactions in different wavelengths. Physical objects weaved by vortical inertial forces are likened to ideas of nature, the analogue for physical object is an idea of nature is on the physical object conceived in a higher order thought is consolidated by EMF of different wavelengths. A solid object relevant to us that has a physical form is consolidated in a steady state by EMF waves of a particular bandwidth, this solid object can be a relatively hollow matter to EMF waves of another bandwidth with other frequencies that have a form in a different state, and vice-versa. Examples of this are light can pass through diamond or glass, and electromagnetic fields can radiate through solid wall and other physical forms that are relatively hollow matters in another state.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett E=Mc2 is the best descriptive of the smashing event to confined energy formula but what if one wanted to create anti gravity for the example. Are we going to ride the top of a mushroom?
Two transient particle form coming to an explosion lifts the item … but so does controlled rocketry and what I purport to is something new.
The event that changes the direction of particle form just by interaction without the smashing event is possible to describe for perception by rule one vectoring. I do not like the smashing thingy, to violent, to ... unnatural or maybe better said un needed?
Why one might want to do this vectoring is to create a true anti gravity form of lift motion in a near inexhaustible supply of energy being used and thus that could be used in space, the true near light speed propellant, vectoring what is readily available in the all, transient vectored formed energy in motion.
There is an event horizon predictable when two particle forms interact by attraction and repel laws of opposite polar state. Where they have come from I label as the negative and where they are to be is the positive and this is to a given snapshot slice, “ where one is looking from a platform in advance he will see a positive form coming at him, where one looks from behind he will perceive a negative gone past him form, so on the event horizon or snapshot point of interaction we predict the vector. We further can predict the quantum changes, the adding and subtracting between the forms.
If in the event that two similar particle forms are parallel to each other in different direction they can be perceived as opposites and therefore going to attract toward each other and thus they will change direction, and be perceived as one stream going from the point of interaction in opposite direction to each other in a vertical plane.
Now we can build on this to varied form interaction. Do we want to? 
Quark would be the base for this study but varied quantified composition of the meld at any level will do just fine on any platform of study. The Aurora Borealis shows rule one in proton interaction but it will hold true to other particle fluid form ... size momentum ... lots of variables ... to many to list here. It is the All.
ill be in here next week Peace Graham ~ |
By all mean Graham, I am with all ears. Looking forward to more insight of your theory next week.
For unifying,