Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat  Thanks for getting us back on topic Frederick. It was a nice respite on my favorite subject i.e. woman. In fact my An Idea has 4 females and 4 males in harmony, not an easy task.
As I left, my inquiry had to do with a reconciliation of gravity with light, part of my post was:
As some of you know, my latest project is an attempt to reconcile gravity with light.
1) Both are infinite in range.
2) Both follow the inverse law, due to their geometry.
3) Both operate at light speed.
4) One is repulsive, the other attractive.
5) Both have 0 charge
In order to come up with a T.O.E. gravity has to reconciled with the other forces. It is my understanding, that at the beginning of the universe there was only EMR and gravity. In fact my, An Idea only requires EMR, it doesn't need the strong or the weak force, in that I believe them to be part of the EMR force.
That leaves gravity.
Guth's theory of inflation, "repulsive gravity" is produced by "negative pressure"
This "repulsive gravity" drives the expansion of space during the brief period of inflation which initiates the universe.
So I would appreciate any and all members help in this attempt to reconcile gravity with EMR.
Best to all,
Pat |
You guys are lightyears ahead of me, but please indulge my observation. I have always been much taken by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity and curved space instead of hoping for gravitons and other notions of gravity. It seems more parsimonius.
Plus, it is tempting to consider mass as somehow related to time. If particles spin, and mass creates sunken areas of space which provide the curves compelling spin to take place, then the two ideas seem to be calling each other. And are we truly seeing the particles spin? Or is this somehow related to the Coriolis Effect? Perhaps "time" might be the actual spinning factor creating a Coriolis Effect??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect