What I get of this post is that 2D+ actually combines two dimensions to give the perception of 3D. When you talk of 2D field, are you talking of force / energy fields?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrick  Dipayankar,
Following your description, everything is 3D. I am not trying to make the point that 3D is incorrect or does not exist; I know the concept quite well like most people, because I grew up with it, too.
However, the dimensions I am referring to belong to a field concept. In the field concept there are two fields (each with a length and a width), and together combined they deliver length, width, and depth.
In case of the electron cloud, it moves in waves which take place in a field of length and height. However, since it is a cloud, it moves through the combination of fields, because there would be depth also. Hence, the electron cloud would be two dimensional fields.
To explain it best, here they are once more, separated:
A/
3D contains three directions of height, width, and depth. In this concept a single direction is considered a dimension. Or...
B/
2D+ contains two fields, each with a height and a width. Attached together, they cover height, width, and depth, just like on only needs two eyes to see the additional depth. In this concept a single field is considered a direction.
They both explain the exact same reality, just like one can say the exact same thing in English and in Chinese.
My point in light of the Theory of Everything is that A is static and is not a natural fit for the toe. Only concept B can deliver the toe. |