Quote:
All observable phenomenon in nature are merely the necessary universal steps taken to maintain equilibrium by means of imbalance.
Until all things are explained, nothing can truly be explained, due to the relativity of everything.
-analog-
|
hey
Analog -
lovely choice of signature -
the very simple basis to the idea is that there are
two spin state duals
1-> <-2
this is a duality -
and the duality when
balanced (

as in your signature)
~ps~
- the duality represents everted counterparts in a 'bond'
~eg~
---1--
icosahedron-> <-dodecahedron
---2---
man-> <-woman
~ps~
man is the icosahedron
not the dodecahedron -
(check out Luminet's paper in the journal Nature ?2003 on the dodecahedral Universe)
Quote:
~ps~ man is the icosahedron
not the dodecahedron -
|
based on space-filling properties
dodecahedron ~ 70%
versus
icosahedron ~ 60%
> icosahedron o-> ->- convex
) dodecahedron o+ ->- concave
ITSA' ALL pertty GEOMETRY dudes
~ps~
I sound silly when I say th
dudesat with an English accent.
Quote:
the very simple basis to the idea is that there are two spin state duals -> <- this is a duality -
and the duality when balanced ( as in your signature)
|
At
balance we obtain a child structure
-> emergent evolution
man + woman -> child
At speciation child is non chimaeric
~eg~
electron neutrinos (lepton)
neutrons
hydrogen (Bohr electron states)
glycine (amino acid with 2xH side chains)
---etc---
including
hermaphrodites (which aren't neutered)
doh!
cunningly confounding my love for word jiggling.