View Single Post
Re: A geometric Theory of Everything
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
SB_UK
Master
SB_UK has much to be proud ofSB_UK has much to be proud ofSB_UK has much to be proud ofSB_UK has much to be proud ofSB_UK has much to be proud ofSB_UK has much to be proud of
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 735
Thanks Given: 436
Thanked 492x in 376 Posts
Join Date: May 2008
Rep Power: 21
   
Re: A geometric Theory of Everything - 05-10-2008, 06:20 PM

dleviwing
emeviwing
fn
go
hp
iq
jreviwing

jrviewing
+
jreviwing
+
jrviewingctoria (the lovely)

Are you familiar with BSE ?

maybe a little too familiar?

Larry Hagman was nice in 'I dream of genie'
Darth Vader had a soft spot on his little chap.

Have you somehow positioned yourself as the guy who has to stamp ToE before it's accepted ?
- perhaps ToE's only
official
after you've swiped it through some overly bureacratic place frequented only by your good right hand.

So -
- does ToE have to mention the word David thrice before you take it for your own -
I can make it happen -

by the way you've lost your place in line for God of Atheism -
are you at all familiar with agnostics -
we've an opening around Saint Agostini which I think we could squeeze you into.

As ever -
your call.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing View Post
I have not seen any real links to a TOE that you insist exists in the other forum. The closest is the concept of a holographic universal mind of some kind. (that’s just bull crap) You have not presented any reference to experimental evidence to support this illusive TOE you keep insisting is real. If your ADHD is so bad that you have difficulty communicating with others then maybe you could provide a translator for your gibberish to help us poor ignorant lil people. No one is going to go through 10,000 post to figure out what you think; if you can’t present what you believe to be the TOE solution in a few simple paragraphs then it is highly likely that you don’t know what you are talking about.

Take a sedative and try again.


dyed sun within sight
.died $in with in see
  
Reply With Quote