Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK  All of this strikes me as difficult to comprehend. Even if one degree of freedom inside a star is achievable, what about the movement of the star in its orbit around a galaxy? Just like a cup of coffee in your car while you drive the limit on an interstate, it may look quiet and motionless relative to you, the driver, but it's really screaming down the highway at 65 or 75 MPH along with you and the rest of the car. (Plus, the interstate roadbed and the Earth are careening around the Sun at over 65,000 MPH.) And what about the universe itself? How do we know that it isn't "screaming down the highway", too? Where is all of this kinetic energy hiding? How can you shield any part of the interior of a star from participating in this energy? A black hole? |
Hey Jak,
I left you a response on the other thread that I was moving our conversation to here, so we wouldn't be stealing Antonio's thread, because it will take a bit of conversation to explain some of this.
One degree of freedom
isn't acheivable within the core of a star, and you are correct to point out the different velocities of the sun, earth, and galaxy.
One degree of freedom represents the max linear velocity of a particle within my framework, or the material aether at its most condensed state within Dave's framework. That's why it isn't acheivable within the core of a star, because a star isn't traveling nearly that fast. All that can happen within the core of a massive body is further condensing of Dave's aether, which translates to increased angular momentum (not linear velocity), or increased particle frequency within my model (which doesn't increase linear velocity).
I'll let Dave explain further about any questions you might have relating to his model, because I would just mess it up; but the model I use to probe our world is similar to Dave's and has helped me greatly in understanding his model, and I can answer as much as possible with it if you like. It may not be as complete as Dave's, but it is a framework which contains the potential for most, if not all phenomenon. I've used it to understand temperature, relativity, my version of the four forces, etc. It's not complete or perfect, but it does provide for an interesting flow chart.
Here's a link to it, but I can save you a lot of time and sum it all up for you, if this interests you.
To answer your other question; the energy of Dave's system and mine isn't hidden at all, it's an effect of the concept of absolute motion of his aether and my particles. Dave created the concept of absolute motion about thirty years ago. I, too, saw it's importance before I knew about Dave's theories, but he's been helping me to further understand it lately. That's the secret to all of the kinetic energy you were referring to above.
Let me know if this helps, or if you would like any further explanation about my views.
Regards,
Tim
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK All of this strikes me as difficult to comprehend. Even if one degree of freedom inside a star is achievable, what about the movement of the star in its orbit around a galaxy? Just like a cup of coffee in your car while you drive the limit on an interstate, it may look quiet and motionless relative to you, the driver, but it's really screaming down the highway at 65 or 75 MPH along with you and the rest of the car. (Plus, the interstate roadbed and the Earth are careening around the Sun at over 65,000 MPH.) And what about the universe itself? How do we know that it isn't "screaming down the highway", too? Where is all of this kinetic energy hiding? How can you shield any part of the interior of a star from participating in this energy? A black hole? |
Hey JAK,
It's not that difficult. I'll explain further, but it might take some conversation and out of respect for Antonio I'll move our conversation to one of my threads. Here's a link to my response...
Absolute Rest
regards,
Tim