[G_burnett]

This would be taken one step further to indicate then the event horizon being the creation of a particle transient form stream with the features of both A+ b- having origin at the event horizon, or a neutron particle form as the streams rotate in all eight dimensions an travel through them ALL.

If we explore the black hole creation the question must be the quantities measure of particle stream A+ b- at the event horizon as is needed to create the duel axis collapse vortex shown maybe. The secondary consideration will be the wave form spin after the event. I would further consider that the rule meets both Gravitomagnetism and EMF theorem where in this event of burnett’s rule one two same particles of mass in relativistic static form are still moving in relation to the universe expansion and therefore in transient slow form with Mass > fluidity non mass form the effect is the same. The EMF repel factor of two similar particle form is as such in the transgenic form fluidic overridden by the parallel direction of two transient forms becoming opposite and attractive to each other by the spin and axis perceptions. Frame dragging inertia along a linear plane with spin and wave form applied can by vectoring be expressed in pictorial form.

Move ones hand linear two parts forward and one back with a spin to your arm and vary the spin and you get the effect of drag. In the first pictorial #3 above you can visualise the effect as the particle form if in mass state as shown condenses and expands in form and moves along the linear wave creating the back wash of drag as it turns on the wave inertia constant.

In the event of a positive proton stream coming parallel to a negative stream the proton is greater in size to positron and electron streams in a wave that will resonant with an attraction and attract as negative positive forces will. The positron being anti electron or an electron with similar charge to the proton travelling in parallel linear opposite direction will react with attraction but in the event of being in the same direction the spin reversal of anti electron in the wave form reversed will attract to the proton or electron and comes not from out of time but the positron comes from out of linear perception to a perpendicular parallel linear vector to the event horizon. The registry of the positron is registry of the change of direction perception and not out of time. Any snapshot will show the positron and you will think it to be a free radical electron and just your perspective reversed but it is a positron and I believe notable in the future development of registry relative to vectoring of the event.

What we do know further that with the frictional forces for example the wave transient particle form slows in a spiral vortex cone to become as to have mass perceivable at the end of the cone momentum curtailed by other. This can be the creation of a black hole if in sufficient mass incapable of emitting and now a measurable event dependent on quantum measurement of the transient particle form interaction the factor of predictability.

The purpose for this viewing and creation of vectors was to vector a vortex. It is in relativity to a c- force that the vortex is created in nature but in space the event has variables of d1 d2 c1 and c2 sets effecting rule one basic. In the event horizon +2 the event is secondary to the event happening in circles all around itself as part of a group that can be rotating as well, centered by a massive c- field to making thus a gravity well or a c- force opening of the vortex or combined effect of with d1 d2 rays.

It was to further give rise to consideration to the stored energy in this world in varied fluid transitional states and out there available for use in passive manner of mechanical form creation of compression and vary to a perpendicular use where such a directional cold fusion change taking place by perpendicular variation of particle transient can be made use of in varied application.

I believe that there has to be ways of utilizing the fields of transient form held in relative static form and by saying this passive interaction by parallel event described

If the anti gravitational platform is to be built we must realise the event described above that takes place that transcends the horizontal to the vertical. As the event gives equal credence to duel vectors one up and one down of equal force the matter might tend to be in the way of redirection of the top force going up and letting the bottom directive vector and vortex do its job of lifting the platform or vice versa by mass collection at the top higher then the mass below or collection of gravitomagnetic forces from outside the planetary realm we are stuck on.

I will leave that up to the math wizards, in saying that I could use an assistant partner in this field of science to bother the formulas down and see how they work out.


The fringe science factor of mixing up the gravitomagnetic and EMF I do not.

I believe the vectoring of gravity fields will hold true to this effect of rule one applied changing the gravity field to vertical spinning vortex effect in two celestial bodies with axis spin passing in opposite directions parallel and producing an anti gravity effect to the mass parallel to where they become one unit of mass to consider but not in a repel such as like poles in magnetic interaction.

The graviomagnetic event vectored using rule one is a combination event of massive proportional consideration that includes in my hypothesis that it is these large celestial bodies, of big mass > +transient minor form, that form the black holes as the dance of the mass continues to varied time that allow for a permanent union momentum changed where jet fluid form emissions of freed radical dispersal changing more the dancing form to collapse into one for even more dispersal, the wheel of wave form formation in a singularity giving from the event horizon is further indicative of an event as per rule one vector.

The event horizon is the same but what escapes in the jets are the parallel vector creation by the event, the slow moving mass the carrier in this case of particle transient.

The smashing of multiple bodies of any size understanding the uncertainty principle to predict in any accuracy where or what bodies will collide in the meld leaves the absurdity that some will be parallel to the oncoming form prior to smashing events and after some are taking place. The instantaneous event of rule one and vortex creation combined with the smashing heightens the probability that a black hole will form exponentially.

How much mass is needed to form the hole? Is it the dance of the muon?

I believe this to be the main query of interest and am with the answer of the event being two particle forms that will interact as in rule one to a “continued” dance, on a horizontal plane and as they deteriorate into one form and emit the carried form in jet stream wave emission. Yes, I know this is cold fusion described.

Then from there we have the forms interacting with each other as inertia fusion begins to create more mass quantities in the grouping and collecting losing all containment in jet stream emitter molecular perpendicular dismemberment both directions from the plate no man made magnetic field will contain other then to aid the event formation. (I had to throw that in to the smashing project Vincent)

I am a bit at a loss to add more without comment by others as the all is a BIG subject, replies will be to the rule one pictorial above posted referenced.

Sorry all that it seems very hurried but I am looking at some further things.

oh an Vincent I seem to be in a grand mah situation with the order of my ceramics so will act accordingly and order them from other then US ... probably the forums have been monitored with all the brains here lol

Peace! ~ Graham