[Profpat]

Originally Posted by JamesANicholson

----------------------------------

Hello, All,

I just wanted to jump in here with a couple of thoughts.

One, I don't know why Stephen Hawking and others assume that information is necessarily shredded and "destroyed" upon entering a black hole. Why isn't it just as possible that it all (the matter/energy/information/images/patterns etc) is neatly laid down in very dense film-like layers on the outer surface of the spinning mass just inside the event horizon and maintains its integrity by the same Newtonian geometric relationships of vectors interacting and conservation of momentum with relativity considerations from the point of view of the "particles" themselves taken into account? Similar to the way that data is stored on your hard drive.Good point Aaron. I believe Hawkings solution is to posit storage in an alternate universe. Some other physicist propose exactly what you are stating regarding the rims as storage rings. In my An Idea I suggested that the quarks may serve as a 3 dimensional storage rings. This could than preserve all information. If the entire black hole evaporates into Hawkings black hole radiation the storage rings you proposed may also evaporate into radiation.

My second point is about negative gravity.
What do you think solar winds are? Aren't they forces leaving a central mass with a reverse--inverse square law effect of getting weaker and weaker with the square of the radius from the source. No one has yet really identified this "force" of solar winds as another basic force, even though it is so obviously similar to the opposite side of gravity in strength and in directional orientation as gravity's inverse--going out from a central "mass" instead of concentrating into a mass point in a balanced way going into a central mass point.

If you read my hypothesis on gravity, it (Gravity)could easily be the geometric result of where solar winds meet each other in any balanced configuration of opposing directions.

Another good point. Quite honestly I didn't consider our sun producing negative gravity but it sure does produce light. I have to think more on this enLIGHTenment.



Respectfully submitted, Aaron

Thank you for your input and very intelligent thoughts.

Pat