| Re: An Idea I think Nobody is still communicating on ToeQuest.
As far a the binary system is concerned: the theory of everything contains everything, and as such it is important to understand each concept within its own set of values. The binary system can be used for a theory of everything, but if you really feel that way, Pat, you must then also adjust your language to that of just being binary. Currently, everyone here at ToeQuest is using close to every format they can get away with; and that contributes to much confusion. For me there is only one way to show the pentaist toe and that is by showing it all in one concept of concepts.
The mathematical evidence I deliver is also not of much valua in the binary system, because close to no one imagines the binary system without a zero. The tricky part, the confusion, the options to leave out that very important phenomenon of nothing and then finding ourselves unable to discover the whole picture and have websites set-up to find the theory of everything is only done in the non-binary concepts. People communicate every which way they can, and by not realizing that, they forget the actual information and cling on to the concepts without making clear distinctions between them.
That is at least the result of a recent study that showed apes capable of repeating information on a screen much better than we humans can. The explanation given was that apes do not have (as many) concepts in their heads like apparently we have, so we can think faster and make bigger leaps of thought than they, but we can also forget to consider what is really here, and even look for something of which we do not have a good comprehension.
__________________ The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. |