[JamesANicholson]

What did I sow here?

Here is a diagram that I use in trying to illustrate the possible workings, of how, just photons and other "light" particles could come together to nucleate or form/reform elements/atoms using nothing but a three dimensional geometry. My drawing is in a two dimensional flat representation, but it should be easy enough to visualize as being three dimensional.

In this diagram, each of the individual arrows represents an "average" photon's momentum for simplicity.

It is reasonable to talk about an "average photon momentum" and represent them in this manner, because, if you simply consider the influence of each possible photon coming into a shared space, you could calculate the overall influence of each and then add them all together vector-ially and divid by the number of photons to determine the statistical "average" photon. This specific average momentum may only exist as a statistical ideal, but it will/should nevertheless give very accurate and reasonably logical results.

This represents a location in space where energy fields, say 'Solar' winds, meet up in statistically perfectly balanced configurations, whether the source of the winds are coming from just two opposing stars or one star vs the entire night sky at the other end of the balance.

Now, this is a drawing that relates a hypothetical (because we can't directly observe it) principle accurately to a possible real functioning model in a way that shows what could be a real-time event for an atomic model.

Now, somewhere around the Plank number or maybe exactly at the Plank number of average photons coming together at one time, you have reached the level of density that allows momentary solidification or elemental nucleation--the forming of an atom of mass 1, a hydrogen atom.

This is the point where gravity (the large expansive solar wind fields that have found their balanced opposition locations) push on each other with absolute matched resistance to the extent that they can only compress internally to grow in density (photonic concentrations) to the point of nucleation.

I know that this is a very different view from the current theory that the basic particles were formed shortly after the "Big Bang and have existed ever since and that the heavier elements are permanently formed in the aftermath of super novae, but I have good arguments why those theories are weak at best.

This is actually premature to share this image here before publishing it in my "paper", but I couldn't think of better way to illustrate my point about accurate (in representation) graphic interpretations.

But since I have, note that this model represents much more.

There is the electron "field" around the area of nucleation, which is simply the area where the direction of the individual momentums will end up being totally deflected into the nucleus and met with equal resistance (opposition) by the sheer density of the combined momentum coming together at that point.

This sets up the equal but opposite "charge" associated with electrons and protons. The proton is the compressed sum of a Plank number of photons.

At any moment there is an equal number of photons directed into the center as there are opposing or trying to leave the center, setting up the dual dynamics ("Positive" and "Negative" forces) of electrical charges with in the atom.

Then as a second stage, as the density grows over time in a "gravity" field where nucleation has initiated, a completely entrapped Plank number of average photons will be contained within the "proton" exerting no outward force or charge (therefore being "neutral" but having a local "mass" concentration roughly equal to the mass of the proton concentration which does interact with the outside "electron" force.

This could be the newest model for the atom, based on gravity being the grand outside force that actually causes atoms to form, tying gravity to the other forces in a rather ingenious way. But it is all based on one thing--photons (actually anything/everything with momentum) in geometry.

In cosmic geometries light particles, across the spectrum, create Gravity wells.

Within Gravity "wells" (destinations, really) you then get atomic geometry coming out of the sheer density of opposing "photons."

This geometry actually sets up the dynamic situation of electrons forming free form as the first nucleation phase--forming and unforming as electrons and positrons. Coming together as electrons and flying apart as the reciprocal positron (the opposite action of an electron)

From this model you get the strong nuclear force (directed toward the center or a molecule or element) when you get a significant gathering of "massive" elemental particles that they can "shadow" each other from directional influences between each other but not from the outside gravitational directional forces which are continually pushing them ever closer together. This gravitational "pressure" is also inverse square related as it gets closed to the individual particle point "wells." This would explain the seemingly "relative" strength difference between gravity, electricity, and the strong nuclear forces.

The weak Nuclear force is then the compressed photons pushing out from both the neutrons and the protons which are only able to break free when heavy densities like radio-active elements are brought up to geological levels of pressure that are too thin, in a Gravitational sense, to equal the internal pressures that were sufficient to create them and maintain them at a position closer to the center of, say, the planet.

There are your four forces neatly tied together and in the simplest straight forward manner using only the momentum of very light photons and Geometry.

And thank you all for the opportunity to express myself here. I think that I have just summarized my ToE here, better than I have been able to do up to this time.

I still need to explain how and why magnetism works according to this model, but it is also very simple as you will see.

'Til then, warmest regards,
Aaron