Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar  I forget the Alice in Wonderland story. However I would really like to churn the additional dimensions that the string theorists predict and then see where it leads us.. |
Alice fell through the floor of reality, down a rabbit hole, and in this imaginary world she had wonderful adventures. I used it as the metaphore that if you fall in the hole of String Theorists that you can then experience many fun adventures. Either way, the adventures are based on fantasy (and fantasy can fill reality almost to the rim).
Do you mean churning as in turning it into something real, Dipayankar, or churning as in agitating the heck out of those theorists who had us by our strings for so long?
Really, if you want to churn strings into some real butter then I have a disappointment to give you; one must start out with real milk to get real butter. One must start out with real dimensions to get the actual outcomes. Start with fantasy/fake/art dimensions and you end up with fantasy/fake/art outcomes (that can have some interesting properties or tell stories otherwise not imagined).
The best way to comment on the string theory deliveries is to ask where their actual information is. The essence is that they do not have additional information, they are just explaining already covered dimensional information in more specific details.
Why is String so interesting for you?