Mohan.c.
---It’s not hard to see where this is going to go. Sigh.
---An argument between a mathematician/believer in all things numerical and an, attempting to be, objective philosopher about subjective and objective nonexistence.
---Ah well. Into the fray of the paradox.
Quote:
|
And a point does'nt have a non-existence existence it is non-existent. Zero is not non-existent existence it is complete absence.
|
---For something to have a
complete absence is to have no knowledge of it, by anyone or anything within existence.
---Since you have knowledge of ‘zero’ and a belief about the concept that it attempts to describe, both
have an existence. The existence arises from a temporal/past perception. It has no existence in the present or ever will in the future.
---The concept itself, outside of existence, has never existed, does not exist and never will exist. It is the nth unknown variable.
---It’s (the described concept) nonexistence creates an effect with all things that exist.
Quote:
|
A line cannot be have more than 2 dimension so practically it is a measure of distance between the two points if you don't want to measure it it just connects the two points.
|
---A perception of a one dimensional line would be a physical perception of the first diMEMsion/membrane and a mental construction of the second diMEMsion/membrane.
---Take it away. Time for the numbers and the religious belief in their truth.