[futrethink]

Mohan.c.

I think futrethink is treating membranes as dimensions.

---I am trying to show a difference between the description of the diMEMsions of length, width, thickness, time, etc and the description of alternate DAmensions/realities.
---Scientist have the hypothesis called M-theory and use that to refer to the 11 hypothesized dimensions, that include the known ones of length, width, thickness and time.
---I have a tendency to bring differing/alternative frequencies/realities into discussions and have begun showing the difference between the two using the above wordings.

I think you are talking of the presence of an object in perception, not physical. Is that right.

---It all depends on how you look at something. Something can be one/physical, the other/an idea, both or neither. Part of that is the inclusion of time: in the past an airplane was an idea, in the present a plane is an actual physical object, to someone who looks at both as being truths, it is both at the same time, because even if we have the physical object, it doesn't destroy the idea that once existed in the past. As to how it can be neither, take away the descriptions of 'idea' and 'physical object' or any description of any kind and it is neither of those things, on one level of perception.
---I can see how something physical can be one dimensional, two dimensional, three dimensional, four dimensional or even more. The problems lie in my attempting to describe how it can be all of them and none of them, without what I am saying seeming to be a play on words or a bad pun. In trying to describe these things, I do my best to keep things as objective as possible and it is usually and immediately taken by the reader as a pun, without them taking the time to carefully think about what I am saying.

Thanks for referring to me as a mathematician, I dreadfully hate that subject and very weak in mathematics. But its really nice to be referred to as one.

---I also called you a believer in numbers and by your next statement of

I think that is why I have more belief in the logic of computers(binary system). Its either true or false. 0 or 1. It exists or it does not exist.

, you have proven me to be right. You are a follower of binary logic. Something is either black or white, true or false and etc.
---Reality doesn’t follow binary logic. Reality is black, white and grey. It is everything in between and none of them. It is also a couple of other colours, that don’t fit into the spectrum of black and white.
---Reality, itself, is only perceived by the things that exist within reality, so to the things that exist and perceive existence, it exists. There is nothing outside of reality to prove that reality exists, so since there is no outside proof that reality exist, to an objective thinker it doesn't exist. Both of those conditions are occurring at the same time and are both truths.