Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesANicholson  (1)I am unsure of what you could mean by "uniform structure" but "not uniform in consistency." Do you also mean density? Or do you mean that the mix of elemental parts, bits and pieces, particles and frequencies is statistically different in ratios of representation, by "being different in consistency?"
(2) And more importantly, if you believe that mass is the driving "force", rather than solar winds, for gravity, can you explain just how that works exactly? Or "WHY" does mass suck? And "HOW" does mass suck? |
Hi Aaron
These questions are best addressed in my thread rather than poor, long-suffering Pat's.
(1) Yes density is probably more appropriate if you want a word to describe a situation where the relevant 'particles' (masons in my model) are closer together.
(2) I don't believe mass is a driving force. The aether/fabric of space deforms in the prescence of mass giving us the effect we call gravity - as regards 'how' you need to refer to the section on gravity in my article.
regards
Felix
PS - for Pat - PRRRRRRRRR PRRRRRRRR etc....