Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK  Melanie, your words seem to extinguish separateness, yet each word is separated by a space and by meaning. You seem to be leaning heavily toward MJA's theory of "=". If this is true, then in a universe without division, without separation, where does motion fit in? How is happy different from sad? How is a bird in flight different from a flower in bloom? And if there is no separation, why should we bother separating them by name?
Thank you. |
The concept and nature of ''Oneness''
Where the idea of opposites dissolve into No-thingness.
Or pure beingness. By it's very true nature all is Pure Beingness.
The concept of a 'you' 'appears' in this Beingness, Awareness, No-thingness.
But it is only ever an idea a concept. We are aware we are aware.
We separate 'things' by name by design to give 'apparent' meaning to life.
We personalize our 'apparent' existence.
Arising AS Self Consciousness.
When we look at a bird in flight or a flower in bloom, we are the awareness,
that is observing those objects, they are a projection of the Same One Self Awareness 'appearing' AS a different form.
The flower and the bird are not separate from that which is observing them [awareness] it is just a different expression appearing in awareness.
The many masks of the one face.
Both perceiver and perceived are one.
Consciousness -at-rest is not aware of Itself.
It becomes aware of Itself only when this sudden feeling,
I-am arises, the impersonal sense of being aware.
And that is when Consciousness-at-rest becomes Consciousness-in-movement,
Potential energy becomes actual energy.
They are not two.
Nothing separate comes out of Potential energy...
That moment that science calls the Big Bang, the mystic calls the sudden arising of awareness..."