Quote:
Originally Posted by Dihydrogen Monoxide  This is where I disagree.
It is a flaw in dualism which causes it to collapse (not dissolve). It is not the truth of oneness which causes the collapse. The flaw causes it. That flaw is talking about A and B without mentioning their difference. Our vocabulary is what does not consider difference. And so oneness asserts that the difference does not exist. But oneness uses the same deficient vocabulary.
To get to oneness one has to reach triadic reasoning. Then by recognizing common aspects and the necessity of common aspects we reach oneness.
The truth is:
oneness requires no collapse
awareness/learning is impossible without difference
it is necessary to point a video camera at a mirror to record the video camera, but then you can't see behind the mirror
science is the act of using two models (mirror and no mirror) to produce a complete picture, just like your two eyes produce conflicting images which resolve their conflict by producing the 3rd dimension |
DM, i am very sorry but i haven't got any idea what's so ever,
of what you are talking about, in your post.
My understanding of oneness must obviously differ to yours.
Mine is a personal vision i am experiencing right now.
It is how i am seeing my reality. From my personal perception.
I am still left wondering if this thread was a bad idea,
as it is difficult to get inside and to understand other peoples minds.
To talk about oneness, must therefore be different and mean different things to each and everyone of us.
Best Regards melanie.