Dave,
What is the difference between the energy stored in a real particle, or the energy in a imaginary one. Maybe the real particle we observe is made up of two, we just call it one. Maybe each quark in a proton has a corresponding vector boson that looks just like that quark to build symmetry in matter, we just imagine them as different. After all, we are only imagining what the inside of an atom looks like, as we destroy an atom in a particle accelerator, and then organize the data in a matrix to try and develope a picture. The problem is, we have a preconceived notion of what parameters we must use when organizing the data, or we think that picture must look a certian way before we start drawing it in our minds. With all humility, I think the preconceived notion in mainstream physics is wrong.
I am not trying to take the terminology literally,(sometimes the terminology doesn't even exist) I'm trying to take the data and observations literally and draw the picture it is telling me to draw.
Chaos reigns in the area we do our sensing, namely the area where matter or atoms come in contact with the ether, and the area where atoms contact other atoms, not the entire universe. The ether has order in the vacuum of space.
Quote:
|
A rule of thumb when referring to spatial density is to think of low special density as a greater randomization of the ether (expansion) and higher spatial density as condensing the ether due to uniform motion. (linear wave) Low spatial density is not the cause of gravity.
|
If gravity is not the result of a volume of low spatial density (namely,matter as the spatial density is lowered by the relative motion of atoms to each other, not the motion of the quarks inside individual atoms, which are not as random) relative to a volume of high spatial density (ether where the virtual quarks that make it up are not moving randomly except where they contact matter), then what is it? These changes in density would cause an energy flow, and create a gravitational field.
Here is the big question. Could it be that chaos reigns only in the area where the space-continuum is warped by matter to cause gravity, and everywhere else the space-time continuum has order, or high spatial density. If that is true, how could we sense it. Every sensor we construct of matter would cause an area of low spatial density around it, even in the vacuum of space. What if I'm right and we can't prove it, because by definition we create areas of low spatial density in the ether just by our very existence. It seems to me everywhere I turn, order or disorder, I am asked to take huge leaps of faith. I challenge you to leap into order to describe what you see, rather than how we got here. As you get to the level of order that you will observe and need to explain gravity and the weak electro forces, the how that order came about will become unexplainable and frustrating. I know it has for me, so then I had to turn somewhere else besides science to answer that frustration.
I have truly enjoyed this dialogue, and appreciate your patience with my learning curve. You have helped me immensely, but the initial picture I had hasn't changed, and I'm sure it works. I will now try to clarify it and send it to you. I look forward to further correspondence.
Brian