Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK  Can you briefly summarize the major paradigms with which your ideas are consistent as well as which ones are in conflict? |
TIME AND THE COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION
Despite much writing on the subject, there is no clear model for time. Even SH's book 'A Brief History of Time' says nothing about how it works. Other popular science writers all concentrate their efforts on the Second Law of Thermodynamics as if this told us much about time. Their argument that entropy must always increase is what imparts the arrow of time - but why and how? No answers. In fact entropy does not always increase with time. There are two major exceptions: gravity and the growth of living organisms both reduce entropy but this is glossed over.
My concept of time is a purely mechanical and has nothing to do with entropy. Nor does it depend on motion which is a result rather than a cause. Time comes about from the emission of chronons at regular intervals (the Planck time?) from the masons. They are emitted with apparently random strengths (or lengths as they are strings) and are necessary for a particle's waveform to collapse. Without the presence of a chronon of sufficient charge it is not possible for the waveforms to exceed the critical value of the probabilty function and for particles to form and interact. This on-off switching controls time and hence motion.
The CBR is purported to be the remnants of the Big Bang. My proposal is that it consists of chronons coming in and out of existence - often referred to as 'quintessence'. The CBR is, therefore simply the sound of the cosmic clock ticking.