[JAK]

Hi Felix,

This is a two-parter. The 2nd part is more important, but here is my 1st part:

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

(1) My own feeling is that magnetism and gravity are very similar in that they are both effects caused by the warping of space. …

I like it. I prefer warping of space/aether.

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Gravity is, therefore, just an effect and there are no gravitons moving back and forth as many eminent physicists postulate. The gravitons are part of the structure of the aether (Einstein's 'fabric of space') and do not move - they simply stretch and shrink. My model is, therefore, a quantum gravity model - a framework which Einstein sought but never found. …

I like it. I prefer warping of space/aether.

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

My model explains WP duality quite simply - particles move as waveforms and only collapse as real particles when they come into proximity with another and the critical value of the probability function is exceeded. …

I like it. I prefer warping of space/aether. The collapse is perhaps the wave just falling into the warp created by the particle? It collapses as it falls into the cup? The warp precipitates the collapse? A “pothole”?

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

The aether has, therefore, to undertake a considerable change in density at the face and this results in extreme stretching of the gravitons which attempts to pull the plates together. …

I like it. I prefer warping of space/aether.

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

My proposition is that reality is much easier to describe - and the description is more likely to be supportable - if it encompasses an aether. …

I like it. I prefer warping of space/aether.

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Time comes about from the emission of chronons at regular intervals (the Planck time?) from the masons. …

I am not fond of adding more features. Each new feature must be integrated with other features of the model. This creates burdensome complexity. I would rather treat time as an emergent property of the model – just like “life” and “mind” are emergent properties of systems. (See my website for my ties to systems and negative entropy as Schrödinger proclaimed.)