View Single Post
Fredrick
Master

Fredrick's Avatar

Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 760
28 Fredrick is a glorious beacon of lightFredrick is a glorious beacon of light
Quote  
05-26-2008, 06:28 PM
Re: The Dance of Shiva

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger View Post
(1) Physics has made no major progress in the last sixty years or so - the longest period in modern history. It is unable to bring gravity and the standard model together (as in quantum gravity) and is deperately searching for a new paradigm which will enable it to move forward from the current impass. String theory is a desperate attempt to bring this about but is not delivering the goods.

GR = General Relativity; SR = Special Relativity; LR = Lorentzian Relativity; QG = Quantum Gravity; SM = Standard Model; BB = Big Bang; BH = Black Hole; CBR = Cosmic Background Radiation; EM = electro magnetism; EMR = Electro Magnetic Radiation; SH = Stephen Hawking; Wiki = Wikipedia; WPD = wave particle duality; SF = strong force; WF = weak force; IMHO in my humble opinion; GSOH = good sense of humour!
Felix, I am trying to get more GSOH in my life, but I guess enjoying other people's GSOHs is also a pleasure.

To bring GR and QM together, the model needs to be correct. 3D is not the model that can deliver, no matter how handy it is for us in daily life.

2D+ is the underlying principle that with division as fundamental aspect, we end up with at least 2 parts that each contain the original. Just like we have two eyes, each eye followed the single (complex) instruction to create an eye.

As I already mentioned in 'An Idea,' the in-out pair is the most important spatial pair in our universe and must therefore be included in our spatial concept to bring us to full understanding. 3D does not provide this intrinsically, so some of us have gone to 10 or eleven dimensions to explain the whole spatial reality. 2D+ reduces the picture to its essence, and has gone to just the basic 2.

1D can best be visualized as a rod, with static point A and not static point non-A at each end. Though A is static, it is moved around in place by non-A. We end up with a disk, with A in the middle, and non-A moving around in this therefore by both aspects created disk. The disk is static also, though it contains the not static part of the rod non-A.

1D is the conceptual visualization of a screen or picture, but it is not length times width, it is a flat circle.

The second D, with B and non-B, added to 1D is fit in such a manner that A and B are located in the same spot, with non-A and non-B moving around in non-parallel tracks (conceptually best to visualize this as perpendicular). At AB we find a 'static' part being pulled by the two not static aspects on non-A and non-B, together creating a globe (or ball, if you wish).

This feature contains all aspects of up-down, left-right, back-front, and in-out. 1D starts out simple, A and non-A, and brings us quite easily to the delivery that contains and explains both classic GR and QM.
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not.
Reply With Quote
Fredrick is offlineReport Post
 
Internet Advertising | Loans | BabbFest | Loans | Mortgages