Hi Jim;
Thanks for the reply to my theory that you made in your FET thread. I posted my reply here because I felt you missed the jest of my Theory. Let me explain where you went wrong.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jimbo/ As I started to read your thread I felt it did not work for me because of your use of the words "aware" and "will". But as I read on I realised that your approach and mine and not so different. I have loads of comments to make but for now I will keep it fairly short.
I believe that the universe has always existed but that it could have started out in its simplest form as a uniform distribution of a real substance energy. This is equivalent to your description of "potential". You then go on to use the term "aware" as being some sort of kickstart to the growth of the present state of the universe. The equivalent of your aware in FET is the centripetal force.
Because energy is a continuous substance, even the slightest of disturbances will result in the creation of a centripetal force. Once started it cannot be stopped. In your theory you say that there must be a "will" so that the inward collapse does not continue forever. In FET the "will" is the point where fluid energy becomes solidified. At this point the centripetal force which cannot be stopped builds up upon the solid until there is another "will" equivalent to the point where the inward centripetal force of the fluid energy is counteracted by the outward centrifugal force of the spinning solid force and the neutron particle matures into a hydrogen atom. Thus everything undergoes a natural number of events just in the clockwork universe described by Newton.
Like you, my wife has for the last ten years believed that I was the only one with these ideas. In fact we have both been working along very similar lines. The main difference is that I have approached from a different angle in that I was not looking for a TOE but only to explain my surface energy data.
Because I started with the assumption that energy is a real substance I have ruled out potential energy as being nothing more than a mathematical way of balancing equations in a theory that is incomplete. However, your notion of "potential" could be applied to fluid energy in its original motionless state. It could even be applied to what is left of the continuum before it is converted into particles and radiation or returned to the continuum as photons run out of energy and particles are destroyed in supernovae. Hence the universe is now in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
Since discovering FET I am of the opinion that once the first tiniest motion appeared the universe had no option but to develop in the way that it has. Unlike the big bang theory where many constants had to be fine tuned in order for our universe to appear out of an endless number of possibilities, with FET nothing had to be pre-planned or organised by any form of intelligence and the only parameter to affect the state of the universe is the density of solid energy. If this were different then particles would still have formed, and so would forces, atoms, stars and galaxies, but with different sizes. |
I believe that the womb that gave birth to this Universe existed forever, and this would be the "Paradox of Potential". "Aware" is the child that came forth from this womb, and we are experiencing its growth right now.
"Potential" is the medium of volume that "Aware" fills. "Aware" is the Something that came from Nothing(Paradox of Potential), and thus is inherent with "Potential".
"Aware" has become "energized" by its interaction with "Potential". "Potential" is that what makes "Aware" be more then it was before. "Potential" is, all the driving forces behind creation. "Aware" is the Something, that by the force of "Potential", becomes "Energized" "Being".
"Potential" is all the "Forces" that we see in action, but can not capture in a test tube. Forces like "centripetal", and "centrifugal". These "Forces of Potential" make "Aware" "Energized" with "Being".
When I use the idea of "Will", I am talking about an "Act" by "Aware" to stop its initial conception. All before the "act" of "Will", by "Aware", was "Aware" filling and creating, a "volume" within "Potential". "Will" was the self determining "Act" that stopped "Aware" from creating "Volume" and reflecting back upon itself. This reflecting back from the "Act" of "Will" is what gives "Aware" the slightest nudge needed to set "Potential" in motion.
"Potential" in "Motion" "Energizes" "Aware" with "Being".
One must see the initial conception of "Aware", in "Potential", before the "Act" of "Will", as a creating of "Volume" within the "Zero point" of its "popping". One must visualize the creating of a "Volume of a sphere" in reverse. In a mathematical term, one must add a "negative sign to the r", in the formula for the volume of a sphere, and r must be seen as a generating factor in the creating of volume from the "Zero point" of popping. The "Act" of "Will" is what stopped r from being a generating factor to a factual number. One must see that "Aware" fell in upon itself creating its own "Volume", for there was "Nothing" but itself to be aware of.
I hope this makes things clearer Jim. This is how I see things right now between our theories:
"Aware" is the "Continuous Substance" that you speak of, that is moved by "Potential"(Vortex), giving it "Fluid Energy".
What do you think of this statement Jim?