Quote:
|
Originally Posted by volantis I was stating that we have to succeed, although that would imply succeeding at developing a TOE. What's the point of making the effort if we are not going to succeed?
As for whether finding a TOE or not is just my belief, I have actually presented a successful TOE. At least, it is successful in the sense that the physics is there, even if it isn't being looked at seriously. |
From this post I see that you are a conclusion-reductionst. According to you, what gives value io something is it's end, how it finishes. Well, that is wrong, in my opinion, because you can try something and although you haven't succeded, you ahve always learned many things, and atleast you have gained experiences that help you.
Yes, I knwo your TOE is succesfull, I have read the ""summarizing"" paper article. It has math, physics and philsophy. It is indeed correct, as you described in your other post, but, for what is it correct? It is correct for itself. The problem is that theories have to be open systems, for the fact that there are several, and that makes them to have to be correct tot he general idea, not only for themselves.