sinjin,
Your theory is not awrong at all, I actualy believe it too. Well, I consider it not anymore a belief but a knwoledge, it comes directly from thousands of billions of experiences in our lifes.
Now I see what you mean. Well, I think maybe I don't have nough knowledge as to answer the question in relation to your theory, but I'll try.
time in itself is not affected by gravity. This is a very hard idea to explain, but I'll try to. Humanity has amde a very big error, and this is, to convert the word time into an entity. Time is not an entity, or not atleast an entity of the type that it is refeared to, I hope the word time dissapears once and for all. Time is, and only is, the change in position of objects. Now, the rate-of-change of position is NOT time, it is the measurement of time, such as nanoseconds, miliseconds, seconds, minutes, hours, days, years, centuries, milleniums...etz. TIME=CHANGE, as you already stated. Now, when an object gains energy, it gains mass. Mass creates gravity. Gravity is a force, that curves space and time. I'll explain. It of course doesn't curve time, it curves sopace. but as time is just change in position of an object in space, then time also curves. Imagen a road that has a curve downwards, and then upawards. If you measure the number of meters from one point to another, it is 20 meters. but if you measure the legth of the road, whicha ctually takes you through these 20 meters, the legth of the read is 100 meters. This means that, going at the same speed, you would take 5 times more to travel the road than you would take if it was streight. So you are taking mroe time for less space, and, as time is just the change of position, you are actually making more change for equal space, and, this is logical, because when you go trhough the road if it is strieght you have less different postions than when you tak ethe whole curve.
This is what happens with gravity. This is what happens: time slows time to the particular object gaining mass. Although I understand it easily my self, I think my explenation will still be no-valid. It's jsut a very ahrd idea to explain, I didn't understand it until when i bought a book on einstein. I would do that exactly.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graybeard Also I believe that the Universe started in an High-Order state !!?? |
what?
If you believe in the big bang theory, then you msut agree that everything was extremely disordered, and thene verything came into order, and then everything goes into disorder.
If you don't believe in the big bang theory then you have strong disagreements with the current cosomological science, and you must give a valid thoery that makes more sense and that has proof.