Ever Curious Soul
Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 455
| |
07-23-2008, 12:26 PM
| | Re: absolute rest? Hello Dave, Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing Something else you may wish to ponder would be to ask yourself how much time is required to convey absolute motion throughout a volume of the Aether to cause the formation of an autonomous object. That same time increment is critical in understanding the quantum behavior of fundamental matter. That is the maximum time allowed to produce physical change in any system; most such events occur in shorter time increments though; some even appear to be instantanious. This will also help with imagining the physical dimensions and behaviors. | I've been trying to define the interactions, or the mechanics, of the states of motion (e.g. linear, angular, vibration, chaotic interference) of the FS, and I have some questions concerning your above post. I see the bonding property being the velocity of change from an unstructured to a structured autonomous volume, as it would be the mechanism for the angular momentum.
Initially, when the spatial density is high enough, and the wave interference becomes constructive enough to form an autonomous volume, wouldn't the increased ability to bond due to the constructive interference be the catalyst to start the angular momentum as it dictated direction to the absolute motion of the forming volume causing it to display angular momentum rather than another form of uniform motion?
Physical change in a system of absolute motion is merely changes in direction, which is dictated by the bonding property, which is complimented by uniform motion. Is there any change in direction that isn't related to bonding at the quantum scale? How does the velocity at which the bonding property alters direction relate to the absolute velocity? Does this have anything to do with what you were refering to above?
In my attempts to visualize this, I keep wanting to give the aether a particle type quantum resolution at which the absolute motion/velocity is transfered, but an expanding/contracting membrane between all of the quantum resolutions at which the bonding is transfered, whereby dictating direction such as seen through the manifestation of angular momentum. The entire formation would be intended to resemble a fluid aether which expands and contracts relative to the state of absolute motion within it; like we've been discussing. Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing We also need to consider the axes of these spinning shells; they too are weaker and are easily opened causing the shell to collapse into a toroidal band like object; we call these objects “magnetic fields”. These objects quickly return to the shell structure if not sustained by some other motion of an object like an electrical current or synchronized electron orbitals. Well there goes another one of the forces. | Wouldn't the synchronized electron orbitals which sustained the torodial bands from returning quickly to the shell structure be a representation of the atomic motions which produce a magnetic object (i.e. magnet)? Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing Why have we never detected the decay of a proton? Well, they don’t decay; they simple collect enough matter to form neutrons. Neutrons keep collapsing the Aether wave functions until they become unstable and revert back to an electron, proton, and gets rid of the excess substance as a neutrino. This whole process of collapsing the randomized wave functions of the Aether results in a basic flow of fundamental substance from the space environment of the universe into the particle structures of the universe; we call it gravity. If you can keep track of all the conversions of one type of motion of matter to another, the whole system becomes quite simple. The details of these conversions are in the numbers and equations that describe mass and energy. Understand “Absolute Motion” and “Self-affinity” and the GUT picture is complete. | As this conversion takes place within a planet causing gravity, are heavier elements still being formed (i.e. periodic table), or are lighter ones being replicated?
I guess what I'm asking is: What happens to a carbon atom, for instance, as it continues to convert the random motions of the spatial environment thus causing gravity? Is it becoming a heavier element (i.e. nitrogen)? Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing Now what do we do about “LIFE”? | On a very light note, I've come to the very unscientific conclusion that we are at the exact center of the absolute motion framework. (Don't tell our spiritual friends on the other side of ToE Town I said this. They'll get the wrong idea, and think they've converted me. ). We're the slowest uniformly moving formation/structure within its medium within our universe. Galaxies, stars, and planets whiz through there mediums with proportional relative velocities, while I barely crawl from bed each morning within my spatial medium (i.e. atmosphere) provided by this rock we're riding on. We're perceivably the closest uniformly moving formation to absolute rest within its medium, but all that missing velocity is conserved through the cellular replication that gives us life; thus no absolute rest for us either.
We've defined the what (aether), how (absolute motion), and why (self-affinity) with our GUT. Now we just need to follow that through all of the cause and effect of the when and where as structures form and motions become relative by means of conserved momentum, and we'll find the mechanism for life.
We'll find it at the seemingly stagnant center of an absolutely moving universe, emerging from the cluttered gathering we've come to know as a planet, as the universe struggles to regain its initial state of uniformity from its imposed state of randomness.
We aren't the reason for our world (i.e. spiritual center); we're at the center of all states and structures (i.e. material center).
Sorry, that's the best I got for now. Can we claim a ToE now? ..... NO? ..... Damn!  | |
| |