Theory of Everything - View Single Post

humanbydefault · 11:54 AM

I see time as the awareness of reality. To us [intelligent species] time is a quantifiable entity. A sort of "dimension" that we normally classify along with space. To understand the nature of time we must first state the nature of reality. Reality, as I have said in the past, is "edited" according to the rate of interaction between the waves that populate the vacuum [ether]. In the realm of atomic distances each harmonic holds a specific elapsing speed of its reality. Harmonics corresponding to "quarks" spin in a different reality context than those corresponding to "protons" and "electrons." That fact is what makes its TIME absolute domain. Albert Einstein considered time as relative between "observers" and their "relative" momentum. My vision of TIME is somewhat different. The same phenomenon I've just explained occurring inside atomic harmonics has a parallel in the parallel in different planetarium orbits.

--------------------

Let's concentrate inside the atomic structure of time for the time being.
Those who read my two-parts article titled "Rediscovering the atomic model" will probably realized that I omitted the so-called "relativistic nature" so many times expressed in earlier developments in quantum mechanics. The sole reason for that was to avoid complications in the overall understanding of the model.
Today I'll be more specific about TIME. (recapitulating a little bit) I've said that the harmonic, corresponding to what we called a "quark" for instance, included a highly dense concentration of spinning energy along with a magnitude of mass equal to one lepton. The same pattern was said to repeat at a "proton" level and later on at one "electron" orbit too [in an energetic configuration that was decreasing as it got distant from the atomic core].
The "lepton factor" I repeatedly emphasized in the past is what give a quanta its "legitimacy" [its right to exist] in the vacuum or ether. I didn't give you any reason to explain such a puzzle and I hope someone will come up one day with the answer. An evidence of this was seen in the phenomenon called "strangeness" after particle collisions inside Atom-smashers.
The universe allows to survive only those legitimate quanta I mentioned earlier and the "plus energy" finds a very brief instant before the same universe that forbids its presence transform them into a more stable quanta ["particle"].
I'm sure you may be asking yourselves "Where is TIME in all this?"
Brace to your chair because what I'm going to say is controversial [what's new...]. Since TIME is the "measurable" perception of the specific elapsing rate of a given reality and because of the fact that reality could only be allow to exist under certain conditions (quantized energy interactions) we tend to see TIME as a quantized entity too.
TIME, mass and heat are in fact scalars and they are not quantized but reality forces it to manifest them in such fashion. We had called heat "phonons" in the past and we have bet our reputation over their quantized nature more than once. We have "created" a catalogue of "sub-atomic particles" out of our imperfect nature to observe the speed of validation of the "law of conservation of energy" in the quantum world.
TIME is no different than those cases previously mentioned to you.
I see two constants across the atomic model of the atom... my model to be specific. One is the "lepton-factor" in those legitimate quanta namely "quarks," "protons" and "electrons." In intermadiate harmonics [different than the one mentioned] the "lepton-factor" is violated as in the case of "neutrons" explained in my articles giving place to decay.
The second constant will refer to the structure of the TIME-configuration across harmonics.
As a closing argument respect to [inter-atomic]TIME I could resume my thoughts in the following fashion: TIME [as the specific elapsing rate of reality] is not uniform at any scale. In fact, it's manifestation varies depending the harmonic in question. It's complex nature and variable structure was not originated with "moving observers" and "mindboggling" thoughts experiments. It's nature originated in the spinning interaction of confronting energies. No energy means no time. No energy means no matter. Mass and heat do not make reality and therefore can't make TIME.

My next post will bring TIME into the macroworld and I have prepare to you a test too. So pay attention to my next post and good luck to all of you guys!

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

	(#1 (permalink))
humanbydefault 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 328 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 18x in 14 Posts Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 16	"The true nature of time" - 09-27-2005, 11:34 AM I see time as the awareness of reality. To us [intelligent species] time is a quantifiable entity. A sort of "dimension" that we normally classify along with space. To understand the nature of time we must first state the nature of reality. Reality, as I have said in the past, is "edited" according to the rate of interaction between the waves that populate the vacuum [ether]. In the realm of atomic distances each harmonic holds a specific elapsing speed of its reality. Harmonics corresponding to "quarks" spin in a different reality context than those corresponding to "protons" and "electrons." That fact is what makes its TIME absolute domain. Albert Einstein considered time as relative between "observers" and their "relative" momentum. My vision of TIME is somewhat different. The same phenomenon I've just explained occurring inside atomic harmonics has a parallel in the parallel in different planetarium orbits. -------------------- Let's concentrate inside the atomic structure of time for the time being. Those who read my two-parts article titled "Rediscovering the atomic model" will probably realized that I omitted the so-called "relativistic nature" so many times expressed in earlier developments in quantum mechanics. The sole reason for that was to avoid complications in the overall understanding of the model. Today I'll be more specific about TIME. (recapitulating a little bit) I've said that the harmonic, corresponding to what we called a "quark" for instance, included a highly dense concentration of spinning energy along with a magnitude of mass equal to one lepton. The same pattern was said to repeat at a "proton" level and later on at one "electron" orbit too [in an energetic configuration that was decreasing as it got distant from the atomic core]. The "lepton factor" I repeatedly emphasized in the past is what give a quanta its "legitimacy" [its right to exist] in the vacuum or ether. I didn't give you any reason to explain such a puzzle and I hope someone will come up one day with the answer. An evidence of this was seen in the phenomenon called "strangeness" after particle collisions inside Atom-smashers. The universe allows to survive only those legitimate quanta I mentioned earlier and the "plus energy" finds a very brief instant before the same universe that forbids its presence transform them into a more stable quanta ["particle"]. I'm sure you may be asking yourselves "Where is TIME in all this?" Brace to your chair because what I'm going to say is controversial [what's new...]. Since TIME is the "measurable" perception of the specific elapsing rate of a given reality and because of the fact that reality could only be allow to exist under certain conditions (quantized energy interactions) we tend to see TIME as a quantized entity too. TIME, mass and heat are in fact scalars and they are not quantized but reality forces it to manifest them in such fashion. We had called heat "phonons" in the past and we have bet our reputation over their quantized nature more than once. We have "created" a catalogue of "sub-atomic particles" out of our imperfect nature to observe the speed of validation of the "law of conservation of energy" in the quantum world. TIME is no different than those cases previously mentioned to you. I see two constants across the atomic model of the atom... my model to be specific. One is the "lepton-factor" in those legitimate quanta namely "quarks," "protons" and "electrons." In intermadiate harmonics [different than the one mentioned] the "lepton-factor" is violated as in the case of "neutrons" explained in my articles giving place to decay. The second constant will refer to the structure of the TIME-configuration across harmonics. As a closing argument respect to [inter-atomic]TIME I could resume my thoughts in the following fashion: TIME [as the specific elapsing rate of reality] is not uniform at any scale. In fact, it's manifestation varies depending the harmonic in question. It's complex nature and variable structure was not originated with "moving observers" and "mindboggling" thoughts experiments. It's nature originated in the spinning interaction of confronting energies. No energy means no time. No energy means no matter. Mass and heat do not make reality and therefore can't make TIME. My next post will bring TIME into the macroworld and I have prepare to you a test too. So pay attention to my next post and good luck to all of you guys! HUMANBYDEFAULT www.humanbydefault.com Last edited by humanbydefault : 09-28-2005 at 11:54 AM.