[analog]

Hello Dave, Graham, and Dip,

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Now what do we do about “LIFE”?

I thought I could add more to my thoughts from post #195 yesterday.

I've been fortunate to learn much from you Dave, and even more fortunate to find that I share similar logic and ideas with someone I've come to have much respect for. The one concept that we both hold true to that I feel is the most important is that we both believe our universe should show symmetry throughout; from the micro to the macro.

The same functions that govern the smallest volumes within our world should ultimately be responsible for the interactions of the largest. We've defined these fundamental functions (i.e. motion, and bonding) along with the fundamental substance (i.e. aether) which manifest them as they shape it to form our world.

Why should life and consciousness be any different? Should we allow them, and only them, to break the rules?

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Why have we never detected the decay of a proton? Well, they don’t decay; they simply collect enough matter to form neutrons. Neutrons keep collapsing the Aether wave functions until they become unstable and revert back to an electron, proton, and gets rid of the excess substance as a neutrino. This whole process of collapsing the randomized wave functions of the Aether results in a basic flow of fundamental substance from the space environment of the universe into the particle structures of the universe; we call it gravity.

Above you've given one of the most defined and concise examples of how our universe works in my honest opinion, and in doing so, you've showed that our world is a process/progression.

Even as a kid, before I knew much of anything about science, I would look at the periodic table and not just see elements, but a system and process; one which all those numbers and descriptions merely represented stages of something; I just didn't know what.

The GUT we discuss is the process which forms the most fundamental structures (atomic), but we almost neglect that these structures continue to form larger structures which, according to us, should be part of the same process and reflect the same functions.

Your excerpt from above is merely describing the structure formed when an increasingly dense volume continuously collects the FS from the less dense medium which surrounds it, as longer wavelength functions of the spatial medium are shortened through uniform motion and bonding. The density of this medium can only support a certain degree of structure (i.e. mass/uniform motion) until instability causes the volume to revert back to two more stable forms (relative to that medium) while expelling, thus conserving the difference as the neutrino.

Why would larger structures be any different?

Life doesn't manifest in the less dense medium of outer space (i.e. anywhere); it manifest within the seed or egg; which is merely its proportionally dense medium. We (i.e. life) are merely the next stage of structure and formation; emerging from the seemingly inanimate platform of this planet from which we further reach out and change our world.

The process of life is merely a continuation of the conversion process we witness at the atomic scale; it merely has more moving parts which makes it harder to keep up with. Evolution is merely the process of furthering structures. The absolute motions of the plant take in the less dense mediums of carbon dioxide, sunlight, etc, and essentially we are taking in other structures, such as them, along with lower frequency less dense mediums and substances, such as oxygen, water, etc.

The cellular replication which is so essential to life is perhaps relative to the conversion to two more stable states within our medium, and perhaps the expelled excess manifest consciousness, which is merely the conservation aspect of life; the neutrino (in a sense) of the structural realm which manifest us; the unique frequency of which, determined by our genes which governs the process, allows us to form our individual personalities as we direct ourselves to further interactions within our realm.

It's all about formation and decay; living and dying; structures and the mediums which contain them; radioactivity and stability; the long road from randomness back to uniformity. Individual formations may revert back to more stable states (from the dust thou art, and to the dust thou shalt return) as death is an unavoidable part of life, but the process grows and lives on.

We're just a slow motion version (due to the conservation of momentum) of the atomic structures (i.e. process) that form us, as every action we take contributes to the further condensation of our universe as we change the medium which allows our existence.

Originally Posted by dleviwing

You don’t need to be able to crunch the numbers to comprehend the concept; crunching the numbers are only good for something like if you fall from a building and want to know if you have a chance of survival or maybe to design an “anti-gravity” aircraft, particle weapons, and maybe cancel the atomic cohesion of the elements without using heat.

Do we really have to crunch the numbers to acknowledge that life can manifest through the formation of structure which is the driving concept behind our world; driven by one fundamental substance and its two properties?

Perhaps crunching of these numbers would allow us to cure cancer or something, but the concept is all I'm searching for right now.

Originally Posted by dleviwing

If you can keep track of all the conversions of one type of motion of matter to another, the whole system becomes quite simple. The details of these conversions are in the numbers and equations that describe mass and energy. Understand “Absolute Motion” and “Self-affinity” and the GUT picture is complete.

Follow that GUT picture through the further formation of more massive structures and their identical interactions within their relative increasingly dense mediums, as the interactions of the micro realm compound to form our macro reality and the ToE picture is also complete, IMHO.

I hope this makes, at the least, a little sense.

later,

Tim