Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 09-27-2005, 03:50 PM

Volantis, thanks a los for your post and time, your explenation was excelent.

I had thought before about what is the difference between the physical existence an dthe mental existence, and, it is a very basic thing. Physical existence has objects (matter, bodies) which alouds to properties-states (energy, forces, solids, mentals...). It also has was I call "fluids" (which are dimensions) and which aloud for interaction, action and reaction. Mental existenc ehas objects (minds) which alud to properties-states (anger, belief, knowledge, love...). But here comes the one unique difference: while sphysical existence has dimensions, mental existenc ehas no "fluids" which could aloud direct interaction trhoughout mental existence between it's opbjects (minds).

This makes us think of three mayor different interactions:
1. PHYSICAL-PHYSICAL (ex: an apple falls on the grass)
2. MENTAL-PHYSICAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words)
3. MENTAL-PHYSICAL-MENTAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words and then you read them, and think about them (go into your mind)).

There is no MENTAL-MENTAL relationship possible. We sometimes say that when two people think the same thing in the same moment, it is because they have a mental conection. But it's no more than what the situation and form of bein of the subjects in questions that made this.

What do you think about my theory?

Now, secondly, I have one thing to ask you. Maybe dimensions themselves can't interact between themselves, but the consequences of them do. For example, intertia and legth have direct relationship. So does time (change) and intertia, or time and legth. The only one that is a bit more dificult to find relationships with is charge, can you give one similar to these I have given, but with charge and any other of the three dimensions?

	(#10 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	09-27-2005, 03:50 PM Volantis, thanks a los for your post and time, your explenation was excelent. I had thought before about what is the difference between the physical existence an dthe mental existence, and, it is a very basic thing. Physical existence has objects (matter, bodies) which alouds to properties-states (energy, forces, solids, mentals...). It also has was I call "fluids" (which are dimensions) and which aloud for interaction, action and reaction. Mental existenc ehas objects (minds) which alud to properties-states (anger, belief, knowledge, love...). But here comes the one unique difference: while sphysical existence has dimensions, mental existenc ehas no "fluids" which could aloud direct interaction trhoughout mental existence between it's opbjects (minds). This makes us think of three mayor different interactions: 1. PHYSICAL-PHYSICAL (ex: an apple falls on the grass) 2. MENTAL-PHYSICAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words) 3. MENTAL-PHYSICAL-MENTAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words and then you read them, and think about them (go into your mind)). There is no MENTAL-MENTAL relationship possible. We sometimes say that when two people think the same thing in the same moment, it is because they have a mental conection. But it's no more than what the situation and form of bein of the subjects in questions that made this. What do you think about my theory? Now, secondly, I have one thing to ask you. Maybe dimensions themselves can't interact between themselves, but the consequences of them do. For example, intertia and legth have direct relationship. So does time (change) and intertia, or time and legth. The only one that is a bit more dificult to find relationships with is charge, can you give one similar to these I have given, but with charge and any other of the three dimensions?