Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion why the cycle exists to begin with or what kick started it? |
1. I tried to explain the initial impact of separation above. As I mentioned,
nothingness had to alternatives:
Either
1. To stay undivided
Or
2. To become separated.
Notice that under the first condition there wasn’t any force, which could kick any process neither from “inside”, nor from “outside” of
nothingness (since
nothingness is homogeneous), so its instantaneous un-separated state sporadically (by itself) turned into separated one at once (without needing in kicking) and that quality of it had been contained in its
probability of separation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion I think most important about the TOE is that it will be profoundly meaningful, not a description of a tedious and repetative cycle. Otherwise the cycle is pointless right? |
Why has
nothingness the probability of separation? And why has this universe the probability of die? Is there any purpose or meaning in it?
Is there any meaning in fact that,
---coin has two alternatives: head and tail, and the probability of falling out of each equals to 1/2?
If we make a coin of any kind, it will at once have head and tail and told above probability of falling out…
If we make an ordinary dice, it will at once have six sides and the probability of falling out of any cipher equaled to 1/6…
Why it happens?
I think all above told is on its own, and so is the tedious and repetitive cycle of universe arising and dying as well…
---So the coin hasn’t got any other choice then to have two alternatives – head and tail,
---Ordinary dice as well hasn’t got any other choice then to have six sides, or rather six alternatives of falling out,
---
Nothingness by itself hasn’t got any other choice then to have two alternatives: either 1.to stay undivided or 2.to stay separated (the second variant is our universe in whole);
And the second (separated) condition of
nothingness is more “durable”, since the first one doesn't last within time and also for annihilation of the whole universe the simultaneous annihilation of all pairs is required (too small credibility)...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subversion what is the meaning of your theory? |
About the meaning and practical use of my theory I'll answer another time...