Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Marketa · **I don't deny... -** 02-16-2005, 05:33 AM

Hello John!
My "theory" doesn't attack classic/quantum etc. physics. I don't deny that these interpretations of observations can be useful (and are useful), but I like to look at things from more points of veiw. E.g. noone is able to explain HOW the energy is "changing" or "travelling" though physicists can describe the conditions when this happens, so why not to claim that energy can be "created" and "destroyed"? That's not less wise and not wiser than the claim that energy "changes" or "moves", becouse nobody can explain none of these phenomenons.
Thanks for your answers, new points of views come from conflicts
M.

	(#32 (permalink))
Marketa Green Belt Status: Offline Posts: 68 Thanks Given: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 Posts Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 14	I don't deny... - 02-16-2005, 05:33 AM Hello John! My "theory" doesn't attack classic/quantum etc. physics. I don't deny that these interpretations of observations can be useful (and are useful), but I like to look at things from more points of veiw. E.g. noone is able to explain HOW the energy is "changing" or "travelling" though physicists can describe the conditions when this happens, so why not to claim that energy can be "created" and "destroyed"? That's not less wise and not wiser than the claim that energy "changes" or "moves", becouse nobody can explain none of these phenomenons. Thanks for your answers, new points of views come from conflicts M.