View Single Post
"Humanbydefault on spotlight"
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
humanbydefault
2nd degree Black Belt
humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
Question "Humanbydefault on spotlight" - 10-06-2005, 10:39 AM

Is quantum mechanics [QM] complete? NO!
Does QM offers an acceptable and correct description of REALITY? Absolutely NOT!
Are there "hidden variables" we haven't discover yet? I don't think so! I believe there are "hidden interests" most of us don't know about it yet!

Now! Let's start with the one on top: Incompleteness of QM.
QM can't and won't give us answers to solve the two slit experiment. It was good for Bohr in his personal aim to destroy Einstein's arguments in the Solvay congress but that's all it did. It cannot offer an answer to what is actually happening to the "Pauli exclussion principle." It can not explain the so-called "electronic subshell overlapping and the length of atoms." It is obsessed with finding the "particle" believed to exist with its own cohesiveness, charge, polarity and other "HUMAN-GIVEN powers." It cannot offer an explanation WHY protons are not willing to decay. It avoids every argument to explain what a FIELD is made since there are not supposed to be "sub-atomic particles" hanging around in the "EMPTY VACUUM" outside the lattice of the magnet.

Does QM offers an acceptable description of REALITY? The whole thing is just ABSURD! It offers nothing but uncertainties and probabilities but on top of that theirs postulates try to convince us that we won't understand them because our own language problems, our incompetence to translate their mathematical formulism etc,etc... NONSENSE!
If you have read my articles and tried to understand them [which I think not everyone who criticizes my posts have... no offense!] I am not attacking the concept of QUANTUM. I am against the "theory of particles," I am against the assumed existence of "sub-atomic particles" with a birth certificate of their own, I am totally against the present atomic model and I went further than that propposing a new one. I'm not just criticizing the present status, I'm giving a better alternative to fix it! With me or against me? It is irrelevant after all, I believe TIME will have the last word on the subject. My FIGHT today and tomorrow is to spread my vision to the world since I won't accept others to take credit for it. I believe I've done a very good job so far. I wrote a book saying exactly what I've said in my articles [under a fictional context for obvious reasons] and my articles have been sent to thousand of scientists around the globe. I do not expect them to answer to me either... Not for a long time I expect, but the day is not too faraway when one will.

The last question: Are there "hidden variables"?
The only hidden variable is inside our imperfect nature. We cannot observe [no matter the advance of our technology] the SPEED of response of the universe in the validation of "The law of conservation of energy." I'm not suggesting crazy philosophical views about mind, spirit, God or religions. I'm talking PHYSICS! Read my articles and "filter out" the "alien stuff" from them! All you'll find are facts! I'll continue with this subject in later posts right here but I don't want to make it too extense... Others have already complaint in the past for it.

I'll answer Greg's comment in the next page... Don't go away because this will turn very interesting and controversial...

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com

Last edited by humanbydefault : 10-06-2005 at 11:20 AM.
  
Reply With Quote