Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tony_fleming hi, just testing the water;
in EMSFT see my other post, gravitation is handled via LINEAR d.e's, a linear version of GR and hence much more tractable numerically.
from the mathematics it appears that there are exactly four gravitational fields all on different gauges; the solar system is the first, the galaxy is next weaker, the super-cluster is next and maybe the universal scale (one universe amongst multiverses) is the last and weakest; each of these forms a series where the centre is oscillating between white and black holes ( so there's an enormous black hole at the centre of teh universe); these 4 are in the form of a series; the forces appear to be based on the p hoton's electromagnetic structure, the first is like a differential of E and H-fields that we experience on the terrestrial domain. further, each of the four gravitational forces has a different 'spin associated with it.
for instance the perihelion of mercury is a spin ahead (? i think from memory); at the galactic domain, the spin is shifted by 90 degrees, so it nether adds or detracts from the orbital velocity; at the supercluster level it be opposite whatever it is at the solar system level and so on.
this can all be tested numerically (much easier than GR which needs supercomputers to crunch each problem) it does appear to my calculations to give reasonable agreement with mercury's perihelion calculated from GR.
enough for now, i'm off to bed!! cheers all |
Definitely TRUE
I've been stating, for many years now, that future scientists will demand that we give the specific gravitational frequency that we are talking about BEFORE we talk about gravity.
Gravitation seems to stem from one of the broadest bands of frequencies yet.
Cheers
Fitz