Theory of Everything - View Single Post - "A theoretical CLEAN-UP in DIRTY PHYSICS."

humanbydefault · 10:22 AM

“ARE MIRACLES POSSIBLE IN THE “QUANTUM WORLD?”

That’s precisely what we are going to find out revisiting my previous “thought experiment.”

In my last posting I proposed to use the same set-up of an experiment done by Elke Scheer’s team of the University of Karlsruhe back in the year 1998. However instead of using a single atom to test its conductivity, I suggest the weird idea of irradiating the same single atom with high-energy photons [in a one-by-one shot]. If electrons were capable of “transit” across the atom from one piece of aluminum to the other as if they were crossing a “bridge” I see no big deal trying to make a single atom to collide with a photon… Do you see it as a big deal? I didn’t think so either!

Let’s present some possible scenario as a result of my thought experiment and their conclusions:

1] An ultra-violet photon will hit the atom and “knock out” a single electron from its orbit. Alleluia! That’s what QM would predict if I’m not mistaken here…! We call it: “The photoelectric effect of Albert Einstein.” After all a Noble Prize was awarded to him in 1921 for his idea, wasn’t it? I bet it was indeed…

So! Let me get this straight! If ANOTHER PHOTON were to be shot against the same single atom once again, what would we see? Correct me if I’m wrong but electrons are not pigeons coming out of the magician’s hat, are they gentlemen?

Electrons are [according to YOU] a form of MATTER since they were particles with a mass of their own. In this case I could only assume that we must have ran out of electrons to keep “knocking them out” from their orbits… You see [my good friend] electrons do not “grow on trees” so they can not appear out of the thin air! What gives us a unique choice: After the first electron scattered from the single atom’s orbital the U-V photon will have no more electrons to knock away and therefore that’s it for the photoelectric effect!

2] I believe that everything I’ve just said above is NON-SENSE! Since electrons were never inside the atoms [to begin with] every single U-V photon will be absorbed by the PATTERN or HARMONIC and eventually REMODULATED into a different type of the same BOSON [light]. The process never ends as long as we keep irradiating the single atom with high-energy light. In my personal opinion, the new quantum scattered from the single atom of my thought experiment will not be an electron as we have measured before in cathode rays. The reason was explained earlier but it doesn’t’ hurt repeating it again: Because regular electrons as the ones observed by J.J. Thompson in 1987 had a more complex configuration. An electron PRODUCED in the bonding between two or more atoms [molecule] carries the energy of one lepton [electron] but in a more complex “ temporal recipe.” The concept is very simple. The same energy of the electron is “shared” between two different spinning realities. In my description of TIME and its nature I said that TIME is the perception of the elapsing of realities. I also said back then that reality is EDITED according to the speed of interception between those waves that are integral part of standing nuclear waves. Every single HARMONIC owns its own reality [and therefore] their own TIME. An electron propagating throughout space (and produced inside molecules) will have its energy split between two different realities and this particular aspect is what gives it its tiny center of mass and its magnetic field. An electron with a center of mass along with a rotating magnetic field due to a complex TIME configuration is the KIND we have seen moving as a “true particle” in cloud chambers before. It’s also the same electron we have seen deflecting as a consequence of magnetic fields before.

HOLES and conduction electrons inside semi-conducting materials move across the lattice as light would.

There is another question I’d like to revise here and that has to do with the so-called resistance observed by the team at Bell’s laboratory back in 1998. They stated that they had measured a resistance against the conduction of electrons across single atoms. I need you to open your mind to what I’m going to ask next:

If the voltage used to make an electron move from one piece of aluminum to the other and across the single atom were capable of producing a current of one electron at a time, have you ever thought about the energy of such electron could carry? I bet you haven’t! I tell you why! Because we have wrongly conceived that electrons NO MATTER THE TYPE OF BATTERY OR SOURCE have the same energy!

Have anyone mentioned the need of MATCHING electrons [as quanta of energy of course] coming from a battery with the specific “valence or conduction band” they will have to use as roads? Have we ever taking into consideration the fact that electrons moving in circuits are being originating from a source that has their own type of electrons? As we all know, electrolytes are not all the same in every battery.

Couldn’t be possible that the difference in energy between electrons coming from a battery would encounter some RESISTANCE when applied to atomic oscillators whose modulating capacity could possibly be somewhat different? I think so too!

Going back to the example seen in the Compton experiment before I assure you that the mismatch between X ray photons and the modulating capacity in atomic oscillators was responsible for the infrared light known as Compton effect! The real origin of electrical RESISTANCE comes from the degree of mismatch existent between incoming energy and internal capacity of re-modulation inside atomic oscillators. As a logical consequence of such mismatch a residual [plus] energy will be scattered in a form of heat or light depending on the density of energy involved.

So what would be the miracle? The miracle would be to obtain a stable flow of scattering electrons from a single atom as the result of being irradiated with high-energy light! That would be equal to say that we could transform light into electrons and that contradicts Bohr’s atomic model and the particle theory at the same time.

In the other hand… I believe in “miracles” of this kind! Such thought experiment would one day demonstrate that I’ve been right all along when I said that electrons were never contingent particles at all!

They are being produced all the time as every other quantum of energy outside the atom and they never ever were part of the picture inside the atomic model.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

www.humanbydefault.com

	(#9 (permalink))
humanbydefault 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 328 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 18x in 14 Posts Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 15	"quantum Miracles From A God Who Plays Dice..." - 10-17-2005, 10:49 AM “ARE MIRACLES POSSIBLE IN THE “QUANTUM WORLD?” That’s precisely what we are going to find out revisiting my previous “thought experiment.” In my last posting I proposed to use the same set-up of an experiment done by Elke Scheer’s team of the University of Karlsruhe back in the year 1998. However instead of using a single atom to test its conductivity, I suggest the weird idea of irradiating the same single atom with high-energy photons [in a one-by-one shot]. If electrons were capable of “transit” across the atom from one piece of aluminum to the other as if they were crossing a “bridge” I see no big deal trying to make a single atom to collide with a photon… Do you see it as a big deal? I didn’t think so either! Let’s present some possible scenario as a result of my thought experiment and their conclusions: 1] An ultra-violet photon will hit the atom and “knock out” a single electron from its orbit. Alleluia! That’s what QM would predict if I’m not mistaken here…! We call it: “The photoelectric effect of Albert Einstein.” After all a Noble Prize was awarded to him in 1921 for his idea, wasn’t it? I bet it was indeed… So! Let me get this straight! If ANOTHER PHOTON were to be shot against the same single atom once again, what would we see? Correct me if I’m wrong but electrons are not pigeons coming out of the magician’s hat, are they gentlemen? Electrons are [according to YOU] a form of MATTER since they were particles with a mass of their own. In this case I could only assume that we must have ran out of electrons to keep “knocking them out” from their orbits… You see [my good friend] electrons do not “grow on trees” so they can not appear out of the thin air! What gives us a unique choice: After the first electron scattered from the single atom’s orbital the U-V photon will have no more electrons to knock away and therefore that’s it for the photoelectric effect! 2] I believe that everything I’ve just said above is NON-SENSE! Since electrons were never inside the atoms [to begin with] every single U-V photon will be absorbed by the PATTERN or HARMONIC and eventually REMODULATED into a different type of the same BOSON [light]. The process never ends as long as we keep irradiating the single atom with high-energy light. In my personal opinion, the new quantum scattered from the single atom of my thought experiment will not be an electron as we have measured before in cathode rays. The reason was explained earlier but it doesn’t’ hurt repeating it again: Because regular electrons as the ones observed by J.J. Thompson in 1987 had a more complex configuration. An electron PRODUCED in the bonding between two or more atoms [molecule] carries the energy of one lepton [electron] but in a more complex “ temporal recipe.” The concept is very simple. The same energy of the electron is “shared” between two different spinning realities. In my description of TIME and its nature I said that TIME is the perception of the elapsing of realities. I also said back then that reality is EDITED according to the speed of interception between those waves that are integral part of standing nuclear waves. Every single HARMONIC owns its own reality [and therefore] their own TIME. An electron propagating throughout space (and produced inside molecules) will have its energy split between two different realities and this particular aspect is what gives it its tiny center of mass and its magnetic field. An electron with a center of mass along with a rotating magnetic field due to a complex TIME configuration is the KIND we have seen moving as a “true particle” in cloud chambers before. It’s also the same electron we have seen deflecting as a consequence of magnetic fields before. HOLES and conduction electrons inside semi-conducting materials move across the lattice as light would. There is another question I’d like to revise here and that has to do with the so-called resistance observed by the team at Bell’s laboratory back in 1998. They stated that they had measured a resistance against the conduction of electrons across single atoms. I need you to open your mind to what I’m going to ask next: If the voltage used to make an electron move from one piece of aluminum to the other and across the single atom were capable of producing a current of one electron at a time, have you ever thought about the energy of such electron could carry? I bet you haven’t! I tell you why! Because we have wrongly conceived that electrons NO MATTER THE TYPE OF BATTERY OR SOURCE have the same energy! Have anyone mentioned the need of MATCHING electrons [as quanta of energy of course] coming from a battery with the specific “valence or conduction band” they will have to use as roads? Have we ever taking into consideration the fact that electrons moving in circuits are being originating from a source that has their own type of electrons? As we all know, electrolytes are not all the same in every battery. Couldn’t be possible that the difference in energy between electrons coming from a battery would encounter some RESISTANCE when applied to atomic oscillators whose modulating capacity could possibly be somewhat different? I think so too! Going back to the example seen in the Compton experiment before I assure you that the mismatch between X ray photons and the modulating capacity in atomic oscillators was responsible for the infrared light known as Compton effect! The real origin of electrical RESISTANCE comes from the degree of mismatch existent between incoming energy and internal capacity of re-modulation inside atomic oscillators. As a logical consequence of such mismatch a residual [plus] energy will be scattered in a form of heat or light depending on the density of energy involved. So what would be the miracle? The miracle would be to obtain a stable flow of scattering electrons from a single atom as the result of being irradiated with high-energy light! That would be equal to say that we could transform light into electrons and that contradicts Bohr’s atomic model and the particle theory at the same time. In the other hand… I believe in “miracles” of this kind! Such thought experiment would one day demonstrate that I’ve been right all along when I said that electrons were never contingent particles at all! They are being produced all the time as every other quantum of energy outside the atom and they never ever were part of the picture inside the atomic model. HUMANBYDEFAULT www.humanbydefault.com Last edited by humanbydefault : 10-18-2005 at 10:22 AM.