View Single Post
humanbydefault
2nd degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 326
16 humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
Quote  
10-18-2005, 12:15 PM
Post "looking For The Wrong Particle At The Wrong Place"

"THE SEARCHING FOR GOD'S PARTICLE: ...is it another joke?"

Let me quote this thoughts from a book titled "Recent advances and issues in physics" [David E. Newton]:
"It is sometimes easy to take the most fundamental ideas of all for granted. Mass is an example. Almost everyone understands the concept of mass... but the interesting question one might ask about mass is, "WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?" [end of quote].
I'm aware that we all must know such fact pretty well, we just keep forgetting all the time and I'll tell you why next as the quote continues:
"In fact, one of the intriguing points about modern physical theories is that THERE IS NOTHING IN THOSE THEORIES THAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE PROPERTY WE KNOW AS MASS..." [the capital letters are mine as you may have guessed by now]... "The equations of quantum chromodynamics (qcd), for example, fully account for the behavior of fundamental particles without imputing to them the properties of mass..."
I agree 100% with such assestement [as Dr. Feynman wrote once "...is a fundamental question" and a big problem we are facing in today's physics].
Those who have read some of my articles could have seen why I have placed so much attention to that especific aspect of physics...
In 1960 a Scottish physicist called Peter Higgs suggested the existence of an electromagnetic field that permeats all space. He thought that as particles [since he still believe in the existence of particles as an inherent entity] travel though space, they gain mass from the Higg's field. The problem with Higg's field is that it appears to have NO PROPERTIES at all. [In my personal opinion "a vey convenient aspect of his proposal"] Anyway! Physicists are trying to approach the problem from a different angle.
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS... According to QM every field has a corresponding particle right? right! and viceversa too. QM PLACES no distintion between fields and particles. A photon traveling across space could [according to QM PLEASE!] BEHAVE AS A PARTICLE OR AS A WAVE. According with Higg's hypothesis [since is not being proved yet and it won't as I see it] God's particle or "his boson" is an unusual one. It lacks ALL of the other characteristic properties of "particles" [such a spin and charge]. It's mass has been estimated to be as big as one atom. [from an atom of iron to an atom of uranium]. But the reason I found this search INCOMPREHENSIBLE is the fact that such "huge particle" they are looking for is MADE OUT of PURE MASS.
NOW! THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO PROVE MY THEORY, MY ATOMIC MODEL AND THE REST OF CONCEPTS I HAVE CAME UP WITH IN MY WORK... WRONG!
Think about it for a second! If they found God's particle I'm out of the game for ever!
I have proposed a physical REALITY [both in my book and in my articles and posting in the past] where MASS is not coming from any field but it is present in the vacuum. My MASS is no different than ash or dust for that matter. I called it "DARK MASS" and I posted for the first time in my article titled "The Young experiment"... my first here.
I made clear to all of you [and potential readers of my book] that mass is part of the "equation" of MATTER as a FTL [faster than light] intervention of the UNIVERSE avoiding the possible appearance of a PERFECT AND FORBIDDEN VACUUM. It's not a secret for any of us that the fundamental different between ENERGY and "particles" is that the first ones could cancel each other out in space. It also means that two opposite waves with equal intensity, phase and frequency simply disappear from the "screen." Of course we are used to think in "two dimensional terms" instead of 3D. Waves in reality are not those perfect mathematical sinusoinds they teach you in high school. It's is my theory that as two waves "facing each other" in space with the kind of huge energy of the beginning of the universe could produce such an instantaneous vacuum in the fabric of space that forces the universe to "push" MASS into the forming "emptiness." We speak about how ENERGY always look for the lower energy-state trying to save what's left of it. It's not ENERGY itself what promotes such behavior, but "the greatest entity" of all: THE UNIVERSE. How the UNIVERSE helps himself in trying to achieve such a task? We have had the answer to that since the very beginnings of our evolutionary state of progress as human beings: MUSIC.
The MOST important phenomenon observed in acoustics is the pattern of interference called STANDING WAVES. QM is not entirely alien to the application of the concept since we all know De broglie idea to adapt it into electron orbitals. Something that "gave birth" later on to the "Pauli exclusion principle."
STOP YOUR READINGS RIGHT HERE AND DO YOURSELF A FAVOR!
Sign off this page and search in the NET the pattern of standing waves! [you could come back at any time and continue later with this] If you don't see a rotational pattern... A sort of spinning of harmonic as the result of two confronting waves you don't have to believe a word of what I'm saying here!
WHAT A PERFECT SOLUTION THE UNIVERSE FOUND TO SAVE ITS OVERALL ENERGY! By confronting each speck of radiation with others around IT found a pattern that will keep both energy specks from an eventual dispersion of its internal resources and at the same time a way to arrange them in different couplings according to an INFINITE number of those bondings.
I'll let you with your research for a time being... My next post right here will keep exploring the arguments I have expressed all this time.

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com [part of my book's excerpt free to the public touches this specific part of my theory]



HUMANBYDEFAULT

Last edited by humanbydefault; 10-20-2005 at 11:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
humanbydefault is offlineReport Post
 
Online Loans | Cash ISA | Advertising | Personal Loans | Myspace Layouts