[TinyTree]

Before you can implement such an analogy, it may be best to have a fundamental paradigm of reality that you will use to interpret the terms of your hypotheses.

Sounds like a good plan.

Do you plan on using the current "Standard Models" (QM and Relativity) or do you intend on creating a new conceptual paradigm?

I plan on using the standard model. Relativity only really plays a part in the evolution of star formation, since it is deterministic it "falls out" (that is, it plays no future role in affecting the probability of the evolution of the system).

However, I would like to point out that the notion of the probability of the evolution of the system is not particularly constrained to the standard model. That is to say- the notion that there is a probability to the state vector of a changing system is only contigent on the idea that there are some sort of mathematical laws governing its behavior (which are tractable to analysis). However, there is no point in speculating about those laws (of which the Standard Model may be a subset) except to note that if they are tractable they are encompassed.