Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 10-19-2005, 05:01 PM

Actually, your response to the first question (that there are no constants) impplies your response to the second question (that it's un predictable).

But if this is true, why does it say in my book something about thisstudent of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology called Mitchell Feigenbaum realised this constant, 4.66920.... whcih was a nonlinear pattern, if there are supposed to be no constants?

	(#7 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	10-19-2005, 05:01 PM Actually, your response to the first question (that there are no constants) impplies your response to the second question (that it's un predictable). But if this is true, why does it say in my book something about thisstudent of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology called Mitchell Feigenbaum realised this constant, 4.66920.... whcih was a nonlinear pattern, if there are supposed to be no constants?