Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK Hi
Wondering about String Theory" (ST). |
As all of us do. Let me give you my personalñ answers, which although are nto ofical, they are factual:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK 1. Isn't the ST dead declared by some US physics institution(s)? |
I guess so. It's also dead according to most of the members in this webpage. And by all the realists. And by all the physicists that are not biast. And the theory itself declares to be wrong. But still, they can do nothing if some physicists want to carry on with it, not wanting to accep the TRUTH.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK 2. Is there some physic observation(s) involved in ST or is it just |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK a plain theory? |
No observation of strings, of membranes, of vibration.... There are some observations but actually metaphysical: for example: "the strings of musicalinstruments vibrate" therefore "strings (fundamental) vibrate".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK 3. Is there any observations(s) that exclusively confirms ST? |
Definatelly NOT.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK 4. Why is the explanation of ST so hard so that any standard layman |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeoK can't understand it? |
Because stringists have been abstracting the theory more and more. Actually the theory itself is possible to understand by avarage people, but the math definatelly not.