Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SimpleKid18 The main problemsthat I have with string theory are:
1) They are so small that they can not be seen, so there is no visual evidence of this.
2) There is no explanation of vibrating strings in space, as we do not yet know what space is made up of, as there is no air, liquid, solid or gas.
3) There is no explanation of why the strings vibrate at different frequencies.
And finally, my biggest problem with ST is:
4) Why does it account for everything, yet it does not count for individual things??? e.g The string theroy says that space-time is all connected by the individual strings vibrating at different frequencies, but a 3D image is set aside from the 4D space-time, so I ask: How can a 3D object be moving at a different vibrating frequency from the rest of its environment? Where is the barrier between the two string frequencies? If, for example, an animal moving in space-time will be moving at a different frequency from its surroundings but when the animal grows larger, it is all still vibrating at the same frequency but where do the new strings come from. Can they reproduce? No, they are not biological. We know they are not biological because string theory also incorporates inanimate objects that do not grow e.g. rocks.
What do you think? |
The second post here mentioned that ST is not realistic.
ST may be right as a theory of physics, but the odds are rather minimal
for to be so.
Discussing theories that are not realistic and Dead declared is also not
realistic for people, try another theory that has better odds, is an advise
from me.
LeoK