Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 I agree that it may still be happening, yet on a smaller scale, such as Gamma Ray Bursts(which I consider the 'rumbles of thunder, after the lightning'). |
I think the event of big bang itself is still happening.
What we perceive is just a part of this event.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 In order for the expansion function to exist, it requires the union of distance and 4 dimensional time. The subsets of this union are the domains of the expansion mathematics function. |
The expansion function which requires the subsets of spacetime is a 'big bang' itself.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 I also believe that the BB was not just a 'one singularity of occurence. |
I think the BB was one event or singularity, but in reality I think the universe is created by more than one event. The only question is... is the universe really created??
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 The role of time, within our local spacetime is critical, without multidimensional time, there would be no cosmos. |
Of course. But this 'time' is a definition science uses. It's direction is caused by the information an observer receives by his relativity of motion. The BB is an event which happens in his totality with the speed of light c. All the other events we perceive are subjective derivations of this one event (these subjective derivations deliver the mathematical prediction of general relativity of
spatial expansion). The time as we observe it is a dopplereffect caused by relative motion itself. Thanks to this general gravitational expansion, this dopplereffect is possible.
Relativity happens because as observers we perceive 'space'.
But 'time' and 'space' are only subjective derivations of spacetime caused by our observations and leading to a real truth (thanks to maths), the truth of 'spacetime' which is the only real. 'Time' and 'space' apart are subjective derivations of spacetime we perceive.
General gravitational expansion is also relative, this means that every galaxy will observe the same gravitational expansion; this is because in every galaxy the observer will perceive constant lightspeed c (which I think to be the speed of 'time'). So general relativity didn't predict the spatial amount of a total universe to expand, it only predicted the observation of the total spatial universe to expand. This last thing also caused by a dopplereffect; but this time by the dopplereffect of gravity (or accelerated motion).
From the perspective of every galaxy, the same expansion of other galaxies will be observed. So gravity is relative. There is no absolute center in the universe for expansion. Therefore I believe expansion is also relative.
I think this can show us a higher 'scientifical' truth. Expansion is a dopplereffect also, so I believe doesn't happen.
Big bang doesn't really happen also, because every galaxy has the observation of expansion and could think it to be caused by a 'big bang'.
Light remains the same speed, I think this just to be 'subjectivity' of gravity.
I think gravitional expansion doesn't really happen, it's a perspective.
From the perspective of one galaxy, you can observe all other galaxies flie away faster and faster... the ones which are the most far away shift to the red (doppler). 'time' doesn't happen. You can never reach the other galaxy, which is normal in nature, just like you can't reach the speed of light (you become heavier). If you want to reach other galaxies, they will just keep on expanding, because you cannot 'grasp' gravity.
I think it doesn't matter how fast you go, the expansion you observe will always remain the same. Nature will keep you from travelling to other galaxies. I believe this kind of expansion being a basic property of the universe. This basic property maybe leading to the other laws of relativity.
I think the final truth could be that gravity is light! (c) ('time')
I think the big bang is only one cause of the universe. It's only one part of the puzzle.
But I think it's still happening. General relativity predicted
spatial amount to expand. So that's also what observers can perceive. Of course they perceive it from their own (subjective) timespace perspective. But this is just the thing I believe to be subjective.
I believe, only timespace is real.
(not time next to space, because I believe that more to be a human subjective observation)
But, I think you're right. There has to be more than just one event (big bang) that caused the universe!
(but I still think it's still happening)
(Anyhow, don't listen to me much today, because I'm still trying to put everything together about these things) (still busy thinking about it);
(answer you later and send new questions when I'm ready thinking it over(bit tired))
I think expansion and it's big bang is just telling us something about a part of the universe. In this part BB still happens.
Could lot's of big bangs be the cause of the whole universe?
Damn, you're smart; you're absolutely right.
The universe has not been caused by just one event!!!
Another thing... Even if a big bang would be only a cause of a part of the universe (which expands), would it actually be a big bang which is the cause???
Maybe if we would increase our insight and find new a mechanisme which combines more 'big bangs' it would bring us closer to the truth!
You know, Q7, your theory is absolutely right.