Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 Are you implying that each galaxy could have been the result of its own BB?
My initial thought,,,,,, it may be quite possible, but I am not sure….
Is the Big Bang continuing? I don’t think so, I believe we would not be here if it was.
|
I'm not sure, but I find it hard to believe just one event (BB) caused the whole universe.
I have total respect for the philosophies of QM we have now.
But I believe they sound not so realistic and they 'sound' as an urge for more realism.
We now have discovered a logical 'subjectivity' by theory of relativity; caused by relative motion.
There might be a logical subjectivity in QM also, but I believe this to be interaction.
It is my believe we could somehow connect both of these 'subjectivities' in a philosophical way.
Maybe the unification could be 'relative motions of interaction'.
The fact is, I think, the difference between a macro- and a microworld is in the microworld we are interacting with it (='active'), and in the macroworld we are being interacted (='passive')!
(the true significance of 'time' is somewhere in between)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quanta07 the things you regret most in life, are the risks you did not take’.
|
Don't worry about the things you cannot change anymore, only worry about the things you still can change. And for more knowledge, I think every risc is worth it (except the risc of death of course)
( warn you, this will sound a bit stupid)
This afternoon, I was having a bath and I thought about the following...
I also thought about resonance, when I let the water in the bath-tub run away.
I compared the water with space, and I saw a little vortex or a space'twister' in it, which rotated in one direction. The closer you got to this twister the faster space moved. This was like a rapid of stream, leading to a water-fall (which also happens with gravity)
I could also simulate waves in this space'water', when I drop something in the water, I get wrinckels and wavefronts in it, which are transmitted over the space'water'. It is the space'water' itself that vibrates in the tub. From the perspective of the space'water', when I drop something in it, then this happens by gravity, also this is coming from a higher dimension.
Also when the water moves to the vortex, everything on the surface of it moves to this vortex to. But it is not the objects on the surface that move to the vortex, it is the water itself.
The reason the 'twister' rotates in a certain direction is because of the polarity of the earth. Consider the universal border being a little hole, and consider the universe being carried by a 'world' in a higher dimension which has a polarity which influences the rotation of the vortex at the universal border...
Also I normally don't hear any strange noises when the 'water' is flowing away. But however, when there is just a specific small chink between the hole and the surface of the plug, I could hear this strange symmetric and regular 'growling' noice. I compared this with 'wave length'. The 'noice' could be 'heard' in other dimensions to. When an electron drops again to the state where it comes from, we get lightwaves.
I also had the idea of resonance; could 'gravitywaves' (or 'time'waves) intensify eachother at the 'border'... Could this influence the dopplereffect?
Also notice the water-tap, where the space'water' comes from...
What if we would connect the hole with the watertap...
Also notice the chaos in the water and the chaos of the froth (which is melting)... Also notice the little pieces of froth are moving towards eachother. The froths are on the surface of the water.
(Sorry, this sounds a bit ridiculous, but maybe I can learn something from it)
Kind regards,
David.
I thought everything over a bit now, and I believe what I send now will be more reliable.
I think the things I've posted untill now to be a bit of a mixture of philosophy and science.
But in order to bring us closer to a theory of everything, I believe it's bad to mixture philosophy and science.
For the theory of everything I believe science is the best way to get closer to TOE.
Q7, I listened a lot to what you were saying, and I think there are lots of correlations which are scientifically really reliable and correct.
I believe, the things I send were more philosophical and much less reliable in a scientifical way.
However, I still really believe in the things I send about every meaning not to be an absolute objective truth, in a philosophical way. I think these things could be more a kind of truth behind the reality we see or behind what we can prove. So I think it's impossible to prove this.
In a scientifical way, I really believe a lot of what you say, I even believe lot's of these ideas will be proven in the futur! This is really very good science.
So in the futur, when I send you something, I will send to you scientifical things or questions.. (speciallyIabout time because that really interests me)
I'll also note above the message, if it's scientifical or not.
Here is what I believe:
Science:
- The universe has not been caused by just one event (the big bang).
- The universe won't be forever; it will vanish, just like everything else.
- These things can get proven.
- The understanding of the universe will get better than now, but you are really on the right track!
Philosophy:
- Time does not exist.
- Everything is a subjective significance, it can never be an absolute objective truth.
- I cannot prove philosophy.
Do you love your parents, your children, your husband, your wife, your family,....,
prove it.
(Don't get my wrong; I'm not talking about you; just wanted to show you something)