Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<>> ... the magnetic force is rotational, and it's particles are constantly moving in a rotative manner towards the centre of gravity ... |
News to me about "particles" of the magnetic force, I just wish society allowed normal people access to science beyond the closed books of school days. That is a disgrace, that at school you MUST study a list of simplistic ideas, that will be all different for your own children, but no adults every discuss these ideas after that, it is actually bloody hard to get any details without the dusty and soically odd paths of library geek, web crank, and so on.
anyway, Guille, I am glad you mentioned about the rotation of the magnetic force. You see electromagnetism has Flemings right hand rule and so on where motion, electricity, and magnetism are linked in a rotation manner.
I conclude that it seems crazy to map the world by Cartesian co-ordinates at all. Rotational co-ordinates, ah, these clearly have a basis firstly in the observed rotations of all real material objects (galazies to neutrinos and all life forms on planets), the elementary observation that we attribute "separateness" only when something rotates independently form another thing; and of course magnetism and electricity and motion are linked by rotation.
Gravity is very very curious. We have not really explained it, we have equations, but it remains mysterious. Field influence across space was at one time through a medium, the ether, today it could be through another medium, the neutrino ocean, which would presumably have fluid characteristics, waves, turbulence, transmission, but I have heard very little on the neutrino ocean from "real" scientist, only pale frightened faces as neutrinos with mass ridicule many past ideas.
There is an exciting alternative to the how many cartesian dimensions riddle, is it 11 dimensions that resolve the problems in a mathematics that I view as suspect? I don't really care, unless that 11 reveals a cancelling out process when you withdraw zero and infinity and replace the maths with looped cardinal/ordinal mathematics, which I feel are truer to reality.
Rotation is always duality, to our human minds. Impossible to conceive of rotation that is not dualistic. More and more I think of a rubber balloon that twists, and the vortex with that small hole, between irreconcilable worlds. And somehow that mathematically also is the Bezier curve, but I don't quite see it yet.
Magnetic monopoles - twist with only clockwise and no anticlockwise, my brain just dissolves. I get as far as a tall baloon fixed at both ends in M-Branes, undulating into contact. At the point of contact of 2 membranes, twisting, rotation. Is this nanoscopic, or cosmic? Both? A tall balloon and you twist the middle, one in each membrane as it were twist and an equal and opposite anti-twist in another membrane or world, as it were as it were fluking language is such a leg iron. To run conceptually is to be free of language, you glimpse the inexpressible, land here back in talk talk and what was that again? Evaporating ideas lost as you scramble a jigsaw of words to fit and then kick the table is frustration.
As a human, I cannot conceptualise rotation without duality. My conclusion regarding the magnetic monopole is that we might find it through a rotational model where, for simplicity of being able to model and think this, the duality, the anti-clockwise that is simply not here, is in another M Brane elsewhere.
Which begs the question, of wormholes as it were between M Branes.
I have a hunch that the Magnetic Monopole is about to become very very fashionable again.