Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Supersymmetric gravity predicts the existence of bosino, photino, wino, gluino, zino, selectron, squark, slepton, etc. I am lost in the jungle of multiplicity and duplicity. |
Oh yes, I remember reading about those in the elegant universe. Not a very atractive thing, supersymetry. Even the name seems magic-like, not proper science.
If we find which of the four forces is more fundamental, then we can say that the others evolved from it. i believe it was gravity, why? because at the begining, the universe was completelly full (even too much full) of matter. Thus, there was no space on which the em spectrum could exist or propagate, so with this we take em out. The strong and weak nuclear forces also didn't exist, because, I believe, at the begining, the matter wasn't atoms yet, it was just condensed particles. So this leaves, by absurd reduction, gravity. And in fact, gravity did exist, because allthough amtter wasn't atomically structured, it had mass, because the particles had mass, so gravity was always there. Thus, the fundamental force is gravity. And so, the fundamental boson is graviton. The gravitons existed since the very begining, with neutrons and electrons. In my opinion, protons derived from neutrons, becahsue protons have more properties than neutrons, thsi one is more fundamental. Neutrons got charged somehow, by quantum processes which I cannot yet describe, until my GUTOE is complete, a long time, but I will. I'm even starting now to doubt that electrons existed sinc ethe begining, it might have been that gravitons and neutrons had these strang einteractions that had electrons and products. then more and more particles were products of quantum processes. I believe the main use and target of qm is not to describe the universe, as scientists have tried, but to describe quamtum processes. Important, but only 1/6 of all of the real GUTOE.