[Mike 5]

All I wanted was to find mathematicians able to help me complete my mathematical theories.

Instead here I am posting some basic ideas on psychology and sociology from the Human Design System. I am deeply impressed by this system as psychology for a number of reasons.

1. Everybody is incomplete. Perfection is impossible except the perfection of being the limited archetype of who you are, of living your own life as yourself. It is a huge relief to all people to forget the expectations of parents teachers lovers children and realise, my limitations are unique and here they are, within that I can be wonderful.
2. Motivation is explained within layers of theory that are stimulating and make a lot of common sense, yet there are geometries never before realised in the flow of energy in basic circuits.
3. Nature and Nurture are explained – in a "bodygraph", the coloured parts are nature, what you are born with. The white areas are nurture, where you are open to influence and the environment. These areas are different for each person.
4. The basic circuitries are simple but powerful – two collective circuits drive logic – the shared search for patterns to control circumstances for survival; and experience – the shared collusion to experience a wide range of possibilities and witness and share all that as culture; the large individualistic circuit – moody impulsive melancholic glimpses of the occult, mystical and unknown that often are glimpses of new truth not acceptable to community. The small survival circuitry – a crossover intent on survival in a ruthless, selfish, almost reptilian way. And the two tribal circuits – with the tribe as the only route an inidividual can get his message to the collective through support, the functions of family, social organisation, ownership, ambition touch and smell. Defence, reproduction and education.

Now to my mind the problem with Human Design intellectually is it’s apparent success to give this chart to that person. All science needs empirical testing but within the paradigm of what is thinkable. There is nothing thinkable about the way Human Design attributes a specific chart to a specific person because the Cartesian model needs homogenous space and time. Homogenous space and time mean there must and will be no difference between a baby born in May from one born in September. For that would imply heterogenous space and time and there is no mathematics to describe it.

Clearly everything we see has some individual characteristics – landscape, planets, people, there is no logic nor evidence to an idea of space an time being different to that actual things or people in those places and moments. But the mathematics of our science is homogenous and better to leave all of that out of psychology and sociology and approach this statistically. Which is what I would like to do.

But we cannot change the world overnight without a revolution. Meanwhile the models of Human Design psychology are just about as perfect a way to explain every human behaviour statistically as I could imagine. It is stupendous. I am overwhelmed and unable to commence.

Let me out of here, I am going to vomit.