[force5]

I've been very interested in many areas of science for most of my life. But, TOE has been my primary focus for the last 20+ years. Although I lack a formal education in physics, alot can be said for an intense desire to find the truth using whatever means available. Heres my problem;

I am 65 years old and lack the necessary skills to properly describe the results I have achieved. A verbal description would not provide a comprehensive explanation and my weak math skills would require me to go back to school for a number of years. Although, I spent a number of years designing large scale computer applications, I did not acquire the necessary programming skills to write 3D dynamic graphics programs. And I believe this would be the correct method to use in order to provide a complete description of my work.

I have spent most of the last seven to eight years comparing my results with the accepted theories of the day. I don't have a problem with these theories but, I like many others, believe a fresh approach was needed to provide an overall explanation. I realize string theory is the leading candidate, but I don't really think the fundamentals should be that difficult to describe. I have also reviewed hundreds of sites on the internet in hopes of finding someone that has used a simular approach as myself and come to the same conclusions. I have found a few sites that expressed very simular views but used different methods that limited their potential in providing a complete TOE.

My approach has been to start at the bottom and work up instead of working from the top down. I guess what i'm trying to say is that thousands of very bright people have been picking things apart for hundreds of years and provided countless facts and theories to draw on in formulating the required componets to design a comprehensive model of a working cosmos. I think most people believe that things should be very simply at the fundamental level and get much more complicated as you move up the latter to the levels that we are most familier with.

I have found out over the years that doing thought experiments is the most valuable tool I have for formulating ideas and solving problems. This is fine until I try to communicate with others. I have labored for years trying to find a method of expressing my ideas with little success. I'm pretty sure that dynamic graphics would be the best way to demonstrate these concepts with visual descriptions. I'm hoping someone might have some recomendations for obtaining the necessary literature and software for this purpose or offer some ideas on producing graphic solutions.

Here is some of my conclusions;

1. The cosmos is a closed system.
2. The universe will not expand forever.
3. There are five internal(fundamental) forces.
4. The proton is a stable particle.
5. A TOE as now viewed is not a complete answer.
6. The fifth force will explain the particle/wave duality.
7. The fifth force will explain gravitation.
8. This theory will explain the extra D's in string theory.
9. This theory will explain the how and why energy propagates.
10. This theory will explain the fifth force.

If this plea for help should not be placed here, i'm sorry.
Please delete if you wish.