[Guille]

Michael, finally here it comes, although with little order: for a physicist, because time ahs gone by so there is more entropy, and for a realist, because I'm not an ordered poster.

Being whole refers to all the actual fact of existing in the total manner of which we exist. This is, each being exists whole, for each being exists in the way it exists, i.e. in the way it is. I know exist whole, whole for what I am. I don’t exist partly of what I am, for what I am is what I exist, and thus, it becomes equal to what I exist, which is thus whole.

Being complete means to have no possibility of arriving at a further state of wholeness from which we currently are. The circumstances in the case of completeness, never change, for completeness makes it impossible, thus, they are eternal. So when a being reaches completeness, the being is then eternal, and so is it’s state (not a state anymore) of completeness eternal.

Thus, the only being that can be said to be eternal is that which is god. But god is a misconception. Being is that property that all entities have, but it’s not an observable property. Due to this reason, entities that study the being are automatically excluding the entity itself from the being, thus, the being is no more the being, but an entity. Thus, god was created.

Now, when an entity has perceptions of another entity which is new to it, in the sense that it has not perceived or conceived it previously, then the entity (if alive, and thus has a mind, like humans) describes this entity in terms of previous conceptions and perceptions of other entities and elements. And this information is from within, from the entity itself. Thus, it doesn’t matter how objective a human is when studying nature, either by philosophy, by art, by human sciences or by natural sciences, the person will always describe the phenomena, the nomena, the objects, the properties and the events in terms of it’s own existence. So, if the world is eternal, we are eternal within. Thus, “our world is us”. But, the world is not us. The world, is that which is true. Here comes the mayor problem of philosophy of all times. Even bigger problem than that which I once describe of separation and union, and it is:

What can we determine to me true, how can we determine what to determine to be true, why can we determine what to be true, and why can we determine how can we determine what to determine to be true?

The member that solves this, will not only have 1/3 of the TOE, but will be the greatest thinker of all times.