Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick For me there would be a problem with a theory of everything,because that very
name to me is bogus!The word Every-thing implies many things-more than one.
well for me that would be absurd and non-sensical,there Is only One Thing,all
else is an illusion,albeit a very real looking one,but still totally false.in the realitive sense there does indeed seem to be many,but as we are all energy and
made up from mindful intention.just trace all the energy back to its source and
when you do that the Apparent many-fold into One.We seem to be hell bent on
finding some sort of Hyper-complex theory the more Hyper the better rather than keeping it simple,you cannot get much simpler than all is mind and mind is all=21 letters that explain Alpha and Omega,and will also throw light on the Prior
Alpha if you think it through? Thisanswer by the way hs been known forat least
12 thousand years and maybe more,man seems to ignore that which is in PLAIN-SIGHT and look anywhere rather than under there noses.what else isnew!
kind regards michael. |
What are we doing here if not to make some sense out of life in a way that everyone can understand. And because not everyone had the same upbringing, very few people would understand similar things across the board.
Your argument that all is mind and mind is all, I completely understand and agree with. This is what The Second Theory of Everything is all about, however,the problem is getting others to see with their own language so they can understand too.
And although the english laguage is limited in it's communication ability, I think we also have to admit that we must work with what we've got. And so segmenting and separating as many things as we can will help a lot more people get to understand.
cheers David