[dleviwing]

Wisp;
I read your book so I understood what you meant.
I agree with the concept that ether forms fundamental units of matter but I don't view these units as being the structured ether itself, except during the quantum foam phase of the expansion of the universe. I see this substance as being affected only by a bonding property and a motion property. Ascribing a term like force or energy to this substance only promotes confusion since force and energy should not be interpreted as fundamental entities or properties of the universe.

We share many common views even though we differ in the fundamental aspects. What I find strange is that 20 years ago after working over 10 years trying to understand reality in terms of QM and Relativity, I too started with a particulate view of ether. I find now that the fluidic view of ether explains and unifies the forces of nature with greater simplicity than the particulate view.

I found your links to Dr. Podkletnov works quite interesting.
Best wishes;
Dave