A Condensed History of Space?

[RascalPuff]

Is a consideration of Hawking's Brief History of Time parallelled (accompanied) by a Condensed History of Space?

Do not the connotations of the term 'space-time' imply that it is?

[austintorn@aol.com]

The briefest history of space:

everywhere.


The brief history of history:

Reason and emotion are hard to coordinate,
Each having a separate pathway to the mind;
That perhaps is all there is to tell about the
Miseries and follies of human history.


Briefer history of everything:

Stuff moved around.

[analog]

Hi Rascal,

I've never read Hawking's book, but in my honest opinion, in the initial absolute state: space (i.e. aether) was reduced to a minimal noncondensable absolute diameter with a length relative to the amount of substance, and time was condensed to an absolute direction of propagation, the absolute states of both of these gave rise to an absolute velocity, whereby the whole system is conserved through absolute motion.

Any divergence from this absolute state (i.e. loss of velocity in the absolute direction of propagation) manifests our relative world (through the conservation of absolute motion) where: spatial deminsions expand; spatial densities vary (e.g. condensates, matter, etc.); time, densities and dimensions thus become relative to velocity; and "energy" is percieved as relative motions change states from uniform (with a shared common direction) to random (directionless); thus, the only means to measure such a relative world is preserved through the initial absolute state which manifest it.

Just my thoughts.

regards,

Tim

[RascalPuff]

Hi Rascal,

I've never read Hawking's book, but in my honest opinion, in the initial absolute state, space (i.e. aether) was reduced to a minimal noncondensable absolute diameter with a length relative to the amount of substance, and time was condensed to an absolute direction of propagation, the absolute states of both of these gave rise to an absolute velocity, whereby the whole system is conserved through absolute motion.

Any divergence from this absolute state (i.e. loss of velocity in the absolute direction of propagation) manifests our relative world (through the conservation of absolute motion) where: spatial deminsions expand, spatial densities vary (e.g. condensates, matter, etc.), time, densities and dimensions thus become relative to velocity, and "energy" is percieved as relative motions change states from uniform (with a shared common direction) to random (directionless); thus, the only means to measure such a relative world is preserved through the initial absolute state which manifest it.

Just my thoughts.

regards,

Tim

Hey Tim:
Without having read Hawking's Brief History of Time, the content of your second paragraph certainly sounds like you've read - and/or otherwise accomodate - Total Field Theory, at
http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...ies.html?ltr=T

[analog]

I've never read any of Hawking's books. I've read a lot of your theory though Rascal, but not all. I know you view matter as expanding and give dimensions to accommodate for electromagnatism and gravity, but there still some aspects I'm not certain of; which is the reason I've never conversed with you about it.

I haven't done my homework on it enough, in my opinion, but I would be glad to discuss it further as long as you don't mind providing clarification every now and again.

[RascalPuff]

Dear Tim:

Thank you for your interest.

Please feel free to issue the subject - I will alternately ad lib and/or refer you to specific chapters (1 thru 20) of Total Field Theory.

[austintorn@aol.com]

The shortest worry and shortest poem:

"I, why?"


The shortest assurance:

"I am."


The longest sentence:

"I do."